search for: hatchet

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hatchet".

Did you mean: ratchet
2015 Mar 30
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
...#39;s the only reasonable thing to do, and if you do anything else and make anyone else support it, you are a bad person. If it's a lack of hardware, CentOS 6 has virtualization built in, turn the server into a VM host and make a centos 7 guest. A one off VM is awful, but better than any other hatchet job you may come up with. Don't do these. For real. They are super fun exercises, but much like linux from scratch, they are painful, hard to maintain, and implementing them would get you removed from my development team. Try following https://gist.github.com/ldx/9116170 but do a cent7 chroot...
2015 Jul 30
0
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
...ke people dumber? Current thinking is that human intelligence hasn?t increased ? or decreased! ? at all in many thousands of years. What *has* changed is that the scope of individual expertise has continually shrunk. I no longer have to know how to knap my own stone axes because I can buy a camp hatchet from Amazon to split the wood I buy at the convenience store on the way to the campground, which has paved roads, an enclosed privy, concrete pads for the picnic tables, and enclosed fire pits with cooking grates. And we call all of that ?primitive living? today! This would be pure luxury to a St...
2015 Mar 30
3
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
We have a third party shared library from a vendor that requires glib 2.15 or newer. We are using CentOS 6.6 which comes with glibc 2.12, and I know it can?t be replaced as it?s an integral part of the OS. However, is it possible to build a glib 2.15 RPM from source to be installed in /opt/centos (or somewhere else other than /usr/lib) so that I can link the one application that requires the
2015 Jul 30
3
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. >> >> Other than
2017 Mar 29
7
Well-formed @llvm.lifetime.start and @llvm.lifetime.end intrinsics
Hi @all, I hit a problem with Polly-generated code which llvm.org/PR32251 . The problem is how @llvm.lifetime.start is placed after Polly transformed the code. Basically Polly transformed llvm.lifetime.start(&var) [...] llvm.lifetime.end(&var) into if (c) { llvm.lifetime.start(&var) } [...] llvm.lifetime.end(&var) now the llvm.lifetime.end is