Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hasweaklinkag".
Did you mean:
hasweaklinkage
2006 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] print ".weak" directive
...ter.cpp 7 Dec 2006 01:30:31 -0000 1.120
+++ lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.cpp 7 Dec 2006 13:00:17 -0000
@@ -640,6 +640,13 @@
printDataDirective(type);
EmitConstantValueOnly(CV);
O << "\n";
+ if (const GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(CV)) {
+ if (GV->hasWeakLinkage() || GV->hasExternalWeakLinkage()) {
+ O << TAI->getWeakRefDirective();
+ EmitConstantValueOnly(CV);
+ O << "\n";
+ }
+ }
}
The approach looks good, but why do you need both 'hasWeak' and
'hasExternalWeak' here? It seems that this...
2006 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] print ".weak" directive
The attached patch makes the ASM printer print the ".weak" directive
when a weak symbol is added to a constant pool.
I need something similar to it in order to bootstrap gcc on ARM.
Any comments?
Best Regards,
Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1816 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached