search for: hasreservedcallfram

...s ago, and thus got the "explicit". PrintReg constructor. When I do not include raw_ostream.h after including Debug.h in the backend cpp files, I now get compilation errors, not only when trying to print floats but also in other places. For example, for the code bool ADRESRegisterInfo::hasReservedCallFrame(const MachineFunction &MF) const { dbgs() << "hasReservedCallFrame() = " << !MF.getFrameInfo()->hasVarSizedObjects() << "\n"; return !MF.getFrameInfo()->hasVarSizedObjects(); } I get llvm[0]: Compiling ADRESRegisterInfo.cpp for Debug+Asserts b...

Can you try making the constructor "explicit" for PrintReg in include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h. I think you were getting an implicit conversion there which should probably be fixed anyway. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Bjorn De Sutter < bjorn.desutter at elis.ugent.be> wrote: > Hi, > > that solved my problem on trunk as well, thanks. Strange that you have to

Hi, that solved my problem on trunk as well, thanks. Strange that you have to include this though. Bjorn On 27 Nov 2012, at 00:00, Daniel Prokesch <daniel.prokesch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I accidentally stumbled upon your post. > I observed similar behaviour whenever I did not include > > #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" > #include

Hello, i am trying to disable reserved call frame from the x86 backend, by setting hasReservedCallFrame function, in lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp to always return false. When doing this i get the correct frame size, and the sub/add rsp instructions around the call correctly, but it seems that the offsets from rsp are not correctly updated between the sub instruction and the call. Is this so...

...Lowering.cpp (working copy) @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ // standard x86_64 and NaCl use 64-bit frame/stack pointers, x32 - 32-bit. Uses64BitFramePtr = STI.isTarget64BitLP64() || STI.isTargetNaCl64(); StackPtr = TRI->getStackRegister(); + SaveArgs = STI.getSaveArgs(); } bool X86FrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame(const MachineFunction &MF) const { @@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ /// or if frame pointer elimination is disabled. bool X86FrameLowering::hasFP(const MachineFunction &MF) const { const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo(); - return (MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF) || +...