search for: hashingtest

...^ > [ 1314s] <stdin>:91:13: note: possible intended match here > [ 1314s] 0x000000b7: DW_TAG_lexical_block [8] * > [ 1314s] ^ > [ 1314s] > [ 1314s] -- > > > and > > [ 1314s] ******************** TEST 'LLVM-Unit :: > ADT/ADTTests/HashingTest.HashCombineBasicTest' FAILED ******************** > [ 1314s] Note: Google Test filter = HashingTest.HashCombineBasicTest > [ 1314s] [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. > [ 1314s] [----------] Global test environment set-up. > [ 1314s] [----------] 1 test from HashingTest &...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 7:18:48 AM > Subject: Re: Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > > Hi Hal, > > > > > > On

Hi Since the buildbot host was updated to Fedora F20 levels, the clang buildbot has been failing with the following: $ /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/lnt.venv/bin/lnt runtest --verbose --submit http://llvm.org/perf/submitRun --commit=1 nt --sandbox nt --no-timestamp --cc /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang --cxx /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang++

...s_integral<T>::value || is_pointer<T>::value) && 64 % sizeof(T) == 0)> {}; . #if __has_feature(__cxx_variadic_templates__) I'm pretty sure non-clang compilers will bark at that unless you #define'd __has_feature(X) to 0? --- a/unittests/ADT/HashingTest.cpp +++ b/unittests/ADT/HashingTest.cpp @@ -13,45 +13,295 @@ #include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "llvm/ADT/Hashing.h" +#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h" +#include <vector> +#include <list> +#include <deque> +#include <map> Sort. + // Helpe...

Thanks for the feedback thus far! I've updated the header file, and enclosed a complete patch against LLVM. This passes all the regtests, and I'll be doing more thorough testing of LLVM itself with the patch. I've included some basic unit tests, but could probably do more here... Not sure it's worth delaying the initial submission though, as the best testing is to use a hash

Hello folks, TL;DR: This is my proposed hashing interface based on a proposed standard hashing interface. It also is implemented with a much faster and higher quality algorithm than the current one. This is an *early draft* of the code, looking for initial feedback. There has been recent interest in improving the quality and consistency of LLVM's approach to hashing. In particular, getting

...or Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling FoldingSet.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[3]: Linking Release+Asserts unit test OrcJIT (without symbols) llvm[2]: Compiling FunctionRefTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling ConstantsTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling HashingTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[3]: Compiling MCJITObjectCacheTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[3]: ======= Finished Linking Release+Asserts Unit test OrcJIT (without symbols) make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_OBJ/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc' make[2]: Enteri...