Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hash_funct".
Did you mean:
hash_func
2010 Feb 06
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] FoldingSetNodeID: use MurmurHash2 instead of SuperFastHash
Some additional info can be found at:
http://murmurhash.googlepages.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MurmurHash
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/hash_functions.aspx
as well as in the patch description itself. Patch and benchmark attached.
Gregory
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-FoldingSetNodeID-use-MurmurHash2-instead-of-SuperFas.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 4202 bytes
Desc: not avail...
2010 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] FoldingSetNodeID: use MurmurHash2 instead of SuperFastHash
On 2010-02-06 17:09, Gregory Petrosyan wrote:
> Some additional info can be found at:
>
> http://murmurhash.googlepages.com/
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MurmurHash
> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/hash_functions.aspx
>
> as well as in the patch description itself. Patch and benchmark attached.
>
>
+/// This version additionally assumes that 'len % 4 == 0'. Below are the
+/// original notes.
+///
+/// Note - This code makes a few assumptions about how your machine
behaves -
+///
+...
2010 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] FoldingSetNodeID: use MurmurHash2 instead of SuperFastHash
...ure total compile time.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Gregory Petrosyan
<gregory.petrosyan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Some additional info can be found at:
>
> http://murmurhash.googlepages.com/
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MurmurHash
> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/hash_functions.aspx
>
> as well as in the patch description itself. Patch and benchmark attached.
>
> Gregory
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu...
2013 Jul 15
1
Packet loss with LocalDiscovery
Hi,
I believe I have found a bug with regard to the LocalDiscovery feature.
This is on tinc-1.1pre7 between two Windows nodes.
Steps to reproduce:
- Get two nodes talking using LocalDiscovery (e.g. put them on the same
LAN behind a NAT with no metaconnection to each other)
- Make one ping the other.
Expected result:
- The two nodes should ping each other without any packet loss,
hopefully at
2012 Jun 23
9
[PATCH 0/5] btrfs: lz4/lz4hc compression
WARNING: This is not compatible with the previous lz4 patchset. If you''re using
experimental compression that isn''t in mainline kernels, be prepared to backup
and restore or decompress before upgrading, and have backups in case it eats
data (which appears not to be a problem any more, but has been during
development).
These patches add lz4 and lz4hc compression