search for: hash1

i want hash like A : 1.2, 3.4, 4.5 B : 9.7, 5.6, 4.8 C : 3.4 ,5.7, 4.6 where A key contain all three value at right sight how to append single keys & values if i have predefined hash with known length -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/how-to-make-hash-append-element-if-i-want-following-condition-tp4409761p4409761.html Sent from the R help mailing list

Is it possible with Ferret to find the location of the matches in a document? For example imagine I have 100 documents and I search with the phrase "bob~0.5" and that returns 3 matching documents. How can I then find all locations in a specific document where it matched "bob~0.5". What I need is something like an array that contains the start index and length for each

...t carefully - and it usually seems to work fine, if you just create one hash and add/delete ips/networks to/from it. I was using nethash. But stresstesting ipset seems to crash the kernel. I had to do only 3-5 runs of the following sequence to crash it repeatedly: # only needed initially - create hash1 (nethash) # needed per each run - create hash1_tmp (nethash) - adding networks to hash1_tmp - swap hash1 and hash1_tmp - destroy hash1_tmp (which now holds the old hashset) Workaround: I changed the above to work without a temporary hashset how. Did # only needed initially - create hash1 (nethash)...

...will possibly need access to grub at boot (i.e. to boot to single user mode to fix a broken configuration file). I've tried generating two different passwords with grub2-mkpasswd-pbkdf2 and adding: ??? set superusers="user1, user2" ??? password_pbkdf2 user1 grub.pbkdf2.sha512.1000./hash1/ ??? password_pbkdf2 user2 grub.pbkdf2.sha512.1000./hash2/ with no success. The first user account worked but not the second. Does anyone know the correct syntax to add multiple grub2 user accounts with different passwords in 40_custom? All tutorials I've found online explain a single user b...

...;) { /* \\ etc */ + r[j] = dname[i+1]; + i++; + } + else + r[j] = dname[i]; + } + + r[j] = '\0'; + + return r; +} + +static char ** +list (const char *udevpath) +{ + DIR *dir = NULL; + struct dirent *d; + char path[PATH_MAX]; + struct stat statbuf; + Hash_table *hash1 = NULL; + char **ret = NULL; + int size = 0, alloc = 0; + + /* /dev/disk is populated by udev */ + udev_settle (); + + dir = opendir (udevpath); + if (!dir) { + /* If there are no labels/UUIDs then udev sometimes won't + * even create this directory. In this case let's return...

...ve developed a little web app with a sqlite3 database in development environment. Now I switched over to mysql2 for production environment. At a first look everthing looks good! BUT, I have delayed_jobs that run methods in the background, where two nested active records were compared with "if hash1 == hash2", then it should just show whether they are the same or not. With mysql2 in production, it shows randomly entries which should have changed, but they didn''t! What I found strange is that it is really random!!! Again with sqlite3 in production or development it is working as...

Along the same lines as the default javascript library discussion [1], why don''t we switch the default test library to RSpec? The stats [2] posted by Xaviar in the other thread seem to support that RSpec is the preferred way to test. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/e9b9cf2233d9a59b [2] http://survey.hamptoncatlin.com/survey/stats -- You received

I'm currently working on a control panel which is using postfix, dovecot and other applications and I want to add application specific passwords to increase security. I found one solution [1], however it requires the password to be included in the query which is something I do not want to do, because the query may be written in clear-text to log-files. So I'm wondering if there is a way

Since the vTPM implementations are being incorproated into Xen and possibly upstream Linux, I would like to see if this protocol change could be added before we have significant legacy implementations. If not, I still think it would be useful as either a v2 or negotiated protocol change. The current vTPM protocol is a copy of the network protocol. This was likely done for ease of implementation,