search for: has_ldm

...+++ b/src/listfs.c @@ -47,8 +47,11 @@ guestfs__list_filesystems (guestfs_h *g) { size_t i; DECLARE_STRINGSBUF (ret); + const char *lvm2[] = { "lvm2", NULL }; + int has_lvm2 = guestfs_feature_available (g, (char **) lvm2); const char *ldm[] = { "ldm", NULL }; + int has_ldm = guestfs_feature_available (g, (char **) ldm); CLEANUP_FREE_STRING_LIST char **devices = NULL; CLEANUP_FREE_STRING_LIST char **partitions = NULL; @@ -83,7 +86,7 @@ guestfs__list_filesystems (guestfs_h *g) /* Use vfs-type to check for filesystems on partitions. */ for (i = 0; partit...

On Friday, 14 July 2017 15:39:27 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > +let rec list_filesystems () = > + let has_lvm2 = Lvm.available () in > + let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in > + > + let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in > + let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in > + let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in > + > + (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems > + * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type w...

...stfs.ml | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml index 56ebadeda..5499bacb2 100644 --- a/daemon/listfs.ml +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml @@ -25,39 +25,18 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = let has_ldm = Optgroups.ldm_available () in let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in - let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in + let devices = List.filter check_device devices in let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in - - (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#...

...+val is_partitioned_device : string -> bool val nr_devices : unit -> int val device_index : string -> int diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml index 370ffb4..1349ae0 100644 --- a/daemon/listfs.ml +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml @@ -25,39 +25,18 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in - let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in + let devices = List.filter check_device devices in let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in - - (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167)....

...nged, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml > index 370ffb4..dc424f5 100644 > --- a/daemon/listfs.ml > +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml > @@ -24,24 +24,20 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = > let has_lvm2 = Lvm.available () in > let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in > > - let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in > let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in > - let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in > > (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems > - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type w...

...opy of the GNU General Public License along + * with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., + * 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. + *) + +open Printf + +open Std_utils + +let rec list_filesystems () = + let has_lvm2 = Lvm.available () in + let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in + + let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in + let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in + let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in + + (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems + * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fail to tell us anything + *...

This patch series addresses comments after v6 series review. Mykola Ivanets (6): daemon: Changing the way that we detect if a device contains partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Ignore partitioned MD devices. tests: list-filesystems command ignores partitioned MD devices. daemon: list-filesystems: Change the way we filter out LDM partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Filter out

v8: - Rebased on top of master. v7: - Addresses comments after v6 series review. v6: - Addresses comments after v5 series review. - Large commit is splitted to more granular commits for better code review. v5: - Addresses comments after v4 series review (part_get_mbr_part_type doesn't break original implementation in C). - Rebased on top of master and little bit refactored for

Initial discussion is here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00188.html. v2 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00246.html. v3 comparing to v2 is just a rebase with slightly changed commits comments.

Instead of parsing 'parted' output OCaml implementation relies on the following facts: 1. The function is applicable for MBR partitions only (as noted in documentation and as function name suggests). 2. An attempt to call the function for non-MBR partition fails with "part_get_mbr_part_type can only be used on MBR Partitions" error and NULL is returned. 3. MBR partition table

This patch series: 1. Addresses comments from v5 series review 2. Large commit is splitted to more granular commits for better code review. Mykola Ivanets (6): daemon: Changing the way that we detect if a device contains partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Ignore partitioned MD devices. tests: list-filesystems command ignores partitioned MD devices. daemon: list-filesystems: Change

This patch series: 1. Addresses comments from last review: part_get_mbr_part_type doesn't break original implementation in C. 2. Rebased on top of master and little bit refactored for readability. Mykola Ivanets (1): tests: md: Test guestfish list-filesystems command skips partitioned md devices. Nikolay Ivanets (2): daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in

...| 22 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml index 370ffb4..dc424f5 100644 --- a/daemon/listfs.ml +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml @@ -24,24 +24,20 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = let has_lvm2 = Lvm.available () in let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in - let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in - let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fail to tell us anything + *...

...ions(-) >> >> diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml >> index 370ffb4..dc424f5 100644 >> --- a/daemon/listfs.ml >> +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml >> @@ -24,24 +24,20 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = >> let has_lvm2 = Lvm.available () in >> let has_ldm = Ldm.available () in >> >> - let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in >> let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in >> - let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in >> >> (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems >> - * (RHBZ#5901...

...------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml index 56ebadeda..eced55bce 100644 --- a/daemon/listfs.ml +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml @@ -24,31 +24,15 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = let has_lvm2 = Optgroups.lvm2_available () in let has_ldm = Optgroups.ldm_available () in + (* Devices. *) let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in - let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in - let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in - - (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fai...

...------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml index 56ebadeda..55ace8e9c 100644 --- a/daemon/listfs.ml +++ b/daemon/listfs.ml @@ -24,31 +24,15 @@ let rec list_filesystems () = let has_lvm2 = Optgroups.lvm2_available () in let has_ldm = Optgroups.ldm_available () in + (* Devices. *) let devices = Devsparts.list_devices () in - let partitions = Devsparts.list_partitions () in - let mds = Md.list_md_devices () in - - (* Look to see if any devices directly contain filesystems - * (RHBZ#590167). However vfs-type will fai...

Before I rush to change something I request your comments on the subject. Let me know what do you think and if it does make sense. The issue: guesfs_list_filesystems is inconsistent in its output. For, example, it filters out partitioned physical devices but doesn't do the same for MD devices. More over, according to its name and API documentation guestfs_list_filesystem should return

Original version linked from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808977#c8 There is no change in the code in this series, but feedback from the original series was we shouldn't lose the error message in patch 7. When I tested this just now in fact we don't lose the error if debugging is enabled, but I have updated the commit message to note what the error message is in the

These commits, along with the associated changes to common: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00286.html support the transparent decryption and inspection of Windows guests encrypted with BitLocker encryption. To do the BitLocker decryption requires cryptsetup 2.3.0 (although cryptsetup 2.3 is not required for existing LUKS use). It also requires a new-ish Linux kernel, I

As discussed in the emails today, this is the third version addressing most points from the v1/v2 review. You will need to pair this with the changes in libguestfs-common from this series: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-September/msg00050.html Rich.