Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "hardware_handl".
Did you mean:
hardware_handler
2017 Jan 31
1
multipath show config different in CentOS 7?
...vendor "IBM"
product "^1814"
product_blacklist "Universal Xport"
path_grouping_policy "group_by_prio"
path_checker "rdac"
features "0"
hardware_handler "1 rdac"
prio "rdac"
failback immediate
rr_weight "uniform"
no_path_retry "12"
}
}
In CentOS 6.x when you restart multipathd or restart server, using
multipathd -k
multipathd> show...
2013 Sep 18
3
multipathing XCP 1.6
Hello, I hope to be in the right list. my question is the following. I
can''t seem to get multipathing configure on XCP 1.6. In XenCenter I was
able to enable "Multipath" however, in the LUN under general tab I see "
multipath 1 of 1 active", the the CLI I do the following command xe --m
node session it list only one session.
Can someone help me please?
Thanks in
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...e) and we were advised to change to using Linux
multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s
is:
device {
vendor IBM
product 1726-4xx
path_checker rdac
features 1 queue_if_no_path
hardware_handler 1 rdac
prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
no_path_retry 300
rr_min_io 1000
}
The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and
mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so
h...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...IBM's proprietary multipath driver to the native
Linux multipathing. Correct?
> is:
> device {
> vendor IBM
> product 1726-4xx
> path_checker rdac
> features 1 queue_if_no_path
> hardware_handler 1 rdac
> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
> no_path_retry 300
> rr_min_io 1000
> }
The right settings are documented here:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Yoi should be a little more specific about the...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...e) and we were advised to change to using Linux
multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s
is:
device {
vendor IBM
product 1726-4xx
path_checker rdac
features 1 queue_if_no_path
hardware_handler 1 rdac
prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
no_path_retry 300
rr_min_io 1000
}
The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and
mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so
h...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...e) and we were advised to change to using Linux
multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s
is:
device {
vendor IBM
product 1726-4xx
path_checker rdac
features 1 queue_if_no_path
hardware_handler 1 rdac
prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
no_path_retry 300
rr_min_io 1000
}
The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and
mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so
h...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...e) and we were advised to change to using Linux
multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s
is:
device {
vendor IBM
product 1726-4xx
path_checker rdac
features 1 queue_if_no_path
hardware_handler 1 rdac
prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
no_path_retry 300
rr_min_io 1000
}
The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and
mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so
h...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...e) and we were advised to change to using Linux
multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s
is:
device {
vendor IBM
product 1726-4xx
path_checker rdac
features 1 queue_if_no_path
hardware_handler 1 rdac
prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
no_path_retry 300
rr_min_io 1000
}
The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and
mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so
h...
2015 Feb 04
0
multipathd
...e) and we were advised to change to using Linux
multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s
is:
device {
vendor IBM
product 1726-4xx
path_checker rdac
features 1 queue_if_no_path
hardware_handler 1 rdac
prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
no_path_retry 300
rr_min_io 1000
}
The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and
mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so
h...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...were told to do so by the suppliers of the V3700.
>
>> is:
>> device {
>> vendor IBM
>> product 1726-4xx
>> path_checker rdac
>> features 1 queue_if_no_path
>> hardware_handler 1 rdac
>> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
>> no_path_retry 300
>> rr_min_io 1000
>> }
>
>The right settings are documented here:
>
>https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Thanks, I shall...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...were told to do so by the suppliers of the V3700.
>
>> is:
>> device {
>> vendor IBM
>> product 1726-4xx
>> path_checker rdac
>> features 1 queue_if_no_path
>> hardware_handler 1 rdac
>> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
>> no_path_retry 300
>> rr_min_io 1000
>> }
>
>The right settings are documented here:
>
>https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Thanks, I shall...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...were told to do so by the suppliers of the V3700.
>
>> is:
>> device {
>> vendor IBM
>> product 1726-4xx
>> path_checker rdac
>> features 1 queue_if_no_path
>> hardware_handler 1 rdac
>> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
>> no_path_retry 300
>> rr_min_io 1000
>> }
>
>The right settings are documented here:
>
>https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Thanks, I shall...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...were told to do so by the suppliers of the V3700.
>
>> is:
>> device {
>> vendor IBM
>> product 1726-4xx
>> path_checker rdac
>> features 1 queue_if_no_path
>> hardware_handler 1 rdac
>> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
>> no_path_retry 300
>> rr_min_io 1000
>> }
>
>The right settings are documented here:
>
>https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Thanks, I shall...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...were told to do so by the suppliers of the V3700.
>
>> is:
>> device {
>> vendor IBM
>> product 1726-4xx
>> path_checker rdac
>> features 1 queue_if_no_path
>> hardware_handler 1 rdac
>> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
>> no_path_retry 300
>> rr_min_io 1000
>> }
>
>The right settings are documented here:
>
>https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Thanks, I shall...
2015 Feb 05
0
UC multipathd
...were told to do so by the suppliers of the V3700.
>
>> is:
>> device {
>> vendor IBM
>> product 1726-4xx
>> path_checker rdac
>> features 1 queue_if_no_path
>> hardware_handler 1 rdac
>> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n
>> no_path_retry 300
>> rr_min_io 1000
>> }
>
>The right settings are documented here:
>
>https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223
Thanks, I shall...
2009 Sep 27
0
SUMMARY : multipath using defaults rather than multipath.conf contents for some devices (?) - why ?
...ath.conf contains this :
device
{
vendor "(COMPAQ|HP)"
product "HSV1[01]1|HSV2[01]0|HSV300|HSV4[05]0"
getuid_callout "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"
prio_callout "/sbin/mpath_prio_alua /dev/%n"
hardware_handler "0"
path_selector "round-robin 0"
path_grouping_policy group_by_prio
failback immediate
rr_weight uniform
no_path_retry 18
rr_min_io 100
path_checker tur
}
- but our actual multipathing as sh...
2009 Sep 17
1
multipath using defaults rather than multipath.conf contents for some devices (?) - why ?
...path.conf contains this :
device
{
vendor "(COMPAQ|HP)"
product "HSV1[01]1|HSV2[01]0|HSV300|HSV4[05]0"
getuid_callout "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"
prio_callout "/sbin/mpath_prio_alua /dev/%n"
hardware_handler "0"
path_selector "round-robin 0"
path_grouping_policy group_by_prio
failback immediate
rr_weight uniform
no_path_retry 18
rr_min_io 100
path_checker tur
}
- but our actual multipathing as sh...
2010 May 27
2
Multipathing with Sun 7310
Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5
Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades
boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to
use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen
by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which
run in
2008 Jun 25
6
dm-multipath use
Are folks in the Centos community succesfully using device-mapper-multipath?
I am looking to deploy it for error handling on our iSCSI setup but there
seems to be little traffic about this package on the Centos forums, as far
as I can tell, and there seems to be a number of small issues based on my
reading the dm-multipath developer lists and related resources.
-geoff
Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim