Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "hardlin".
Did you mean:
hardlink
2019 Feb 21
3
Active Directory one Client with multiple IP addresses
Is is possible to assign one name to a client, but have multiple ip
addresses (3 or more) say for a laptop that can be connected by wireless,
hardline on laptop, or hard-line on docking station where DHCP server
issues multiple ip addresses for each connection which could be used
simultaneously or individually?
and have nslookup yield the one of the working/connected ip address or say
first working if only 1 is connected?
2004 Jun 21
4
integrating with existing PBX
I'm looking for a way to give VoIP capabilities to an existing PBX: it's
made by Mitel and it's used in a small/medium environment (a few dozen
phones, but the PBX has capabilities for up to 200, if i remember
correctly).
Any high-level guidelines on how to integrate Asterisk with a PBX that's
already in use? Probably that particular PBX is not supported directly,
but are there
2012 Apr 15
0
Bug#666024: rsync --link-dest can incorrectly hardlink together destination files
...tached Debian bug report, which includes a helpful
bug-reproducing shell script; I've confirmed this still happens with
3.0.9.
Paul Slootman
On Tue 27 Mar 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: rsync
> Version: 3.0.7-2
>
> With rsync --link-dest, if two different source files (not hardlinked
> to each other) are both candidates for being hardlinked from files of
> the same name in the link-dest directory, both of them may be so
> hardlinked. The effect is that on the destination the two files
> become hardlined to each other even though they are not hardlinked
> toge...
2014 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] Clarification on the backward compatibility promises
...xplicitly gone against the rules we set for metadata a long
> time back:
>
> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/extensible-metadata-in-llvm-ir.html
>
> Unless I'm missing your point completely of course :)
I don’t disagree with this. I am only cautioning against taking an absolutely hardline attitude towards metadata compatibility. As long as we take a pragmatic approach by providing ways for clients to maintain backward compatibility, I don’t think anyone will have problems with the stated policy. We will need to be very careful if / when we propose fundamental changes.
Evan
>...
2004 Jun 16
6
Invalid Extensions -- More like traditional PBX systems?
...ot-in-service gsm file and then play congestion tones. I would
rather like this better than just hearing a busy signal on my phones.. I
DID search around on the wiki and using google and could not find anything.
Thanks.
--
Stephen Rosebush,
srosebush@desynched.org
http://www.desynched.org/
// Hardline // IP Phone
USA: 1-248-724-4452 x201 FWD: 63420 x201
Netherlands: +31-(0)20-6598858 x63420 x201 IAXTEL: 1-700-356-6191 x201
United Kingom: +44-(0)870-3403054 x201 SIP: sip:srosebush@desynched.org
2019 Feb 22
0
Active Directory one Client with multiple IP addresses
...ruari 2019 23:59
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: [Samba] Active Directory one Client with multiple
> IP addresses
>
> Is is possible to assign one name to a client, but have multiple ip
> addresses (3 or more) say for a laptop that can be connected by wireless,
> hardline on laptop, or hard-line on docking station
> where DHCP server issues multiple ip addresses for each connection which could be used simultaneously or individually?
Thats not how windows work.
You have someing as priorities on the connections.
Above should be.
Docking station > prio 1
NIC...
2005 Feb 18
2
VONAGE <----> ASTERISK SIP TERMINATION?????
Has anyone out there successfully set up their * box to terminate their
VONAGE calls?
I (and I am sure lots of others) would love to hear how you did it.
I'd like to be able to get rid of the extra hardware I have hanging around
here and use the ASTERISK machine to handle the SIP termination instead of
needing to have a Linksys modem (w/phone) and an additional X100P card.
Thanks.
2012 Sep 12
1
opus-tools resampler
Hi,
I've noticed that the opus-tools is using a really old version of Speex's resampler code - a version that I've seen fail in the wild first-hand under low resource circumstances. I've actually submitted patches for some issues in the Speex resampler a while ago (and IIRC they were accepted): http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2009-November/007541.html ,
2013 Sep 09
2
How to disable SSL and TLSv1.1?
I'm running Dovecot 2.2.5 and want to make it refuse SSLv2, SSLv3 and
TLSv1.0. Clients will opportunistically use TLS 1.1 and 1.2, but now I
want require they do so. Is it enough to set
ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!SSLv2:!SSLv3:!TLSv1.0:!aNULL:!MD5
or are there additional settings I need to specify?
2004 Jul 06
4
Newbie's doubt on sip.conf
Hi,
I have some doubts on sip.conf.
1) Can I have two or more SIP phones acting as
extensions in one Asterisk box, and at the same time,
registered to a SIP proxy, say Free World Dialup? If
yes, how?
2) Why we need a section in the sip.conf for the
proxy, say, Free World Dialup's fwd.pulver.com? In the
case of 1), how to assign the value to section
[fwd.pulver.com], since there are more
2011 Sep 08
1
Jitter only affecting meetme - and echo testing
Greetings List!
I'm currently rolling out a new deployment of Asterisk 1.8 to replace
existing 1.2 servers...and have run into an issue which could use your
assistance!
For testing I have trunked (iax2) two of the servers - one running 1.8 and
the other at 1.2. Calls placed from SIP --> SIP sound fantastic and crystal
clear. However, when I place a echo test call (*43) from 1.8 to 1.2
2014 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] Clarification on the backward compatibility promises
On Jul 9, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> 2. Metadata compatibility. We already had precedence of introducing
>>>>>
2012 Jul 07
18
Problem processing text file after uploading
I''ve got a web-app currently partially working. The user uploads a .txt,
.docx or .doc file to the server.
Currently the model handles those files, saves some metadata (the
extention and orig filename) then saves the file to the hard drive. Next
it converts the doc and docx files to plain text and saves the output to
a txt file.
My problem is I want to copy the plain text contents of
2004 Jul 09
2
vonage.ca * integration possible?
I just got setup with vonage.ca with the motorola ata unit.. I fired up
ethreal and checked out what's flying over the network... The sniff below
would lead me to believe that it might be possible to have asterisk spoof
the User-Agent field and register itself?
Any thoughts/feedback? Thanks.
>
> No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
>
2015 Nov 18
2
Reimplementing Darwin's dsymutil as an lld helper
(oops, switch mailing list)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:07 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wee, delayed response, but nothing drastic:
>
> I just noticed the tool is "llvm-dsymutil" but it's in tools/dsymutil,
> unlike all the other tools that have the llvm-prefix in the directory name.
> Could we move it to "tools/llvm-dsymutil" for
2004 Jul 07
7
New PBX Help
Hi All,
We recently had an old office building burn down. The office housed
maybe 20-30 people. Only about 10 or so of those had their own
extensions. We had a standard pbx from an area communications company,
and I'm not quite sure about what kind of phone lines were there, I only
know that their were actually 3 phone numbers, but everyone could get an
outside line if they needed
2006 Apr 28
19
Remember James McGovern?
Remember James McGovern and his articles about Rails and enterprise?
Well... Check this one out where he "puts his money where his mouth is"
http://duckdown.blogspot.com/2006/04/ruby-community-proved-mcgovern-wrong.html
--
--------------
Jon Gretar Borgthorsson
http://www.jongretar.net/
2006 Nov 30
41
TDD killing my joy of Rails
I''ve been working through the book ''Beginning Ruby on Rails E-Commerce''
which is very heavy on Test Driven Development. As in, you have to
write tests for scaffolding methods and validations and crap like that.
And then they fail. And you KNOW its the test not the method. So you
spend 2x the time writing a test that has to be adapted when
requirements change. You