search for: harb

...isons. But as the data are in the percentaje form, I know I need to analize them with either a chi squared or a g-test, but I have no idea if I can do such a test with many comparissons or how to do it in R, as well I have seen a paper in which they do something similar and they are using a Harber's chi squared test. Does anybody know how to do that in R? Thank you very much for your help, and thanks to the jim and chuck for answering my previous statistical question! Lucia [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Master... I am Rene Harb Hoecker and from Chile..... nice!!! I would like to ask you.......... so I am using pxe and when I configure this one with pxelinix.0 and this file read pxelinux.cfg and inside there is the config file default. it is work perfect....... default file say so : DAFAULT Gentoo1.4 LABEL Gentoo1.4 KER...

The release notes state that gnumeric has been included in this distribution. Was it forgotten? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: joe-harb.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 298 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050331/1a93e957/attachment-0005.vcf>

...a certain rev. (don't remember the version) the card socket no longer worked. Going back to an un-upgraded install of Fedora 3 worked. Has anyone seen this problem and worked this out with Centos? Joe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: joe-harb.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 298 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050418/db005e17/attachment-0001.vcf>

Has anyone been successful with PCMCIA cards being seen by CentOS4? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: joe-harb.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 298 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050425/7769c81f/attachment-0001.vcf>

I would really like some or any advice on how I can improve (or fix??) the following analysis. I hope I have provided a completely runnable code - it doesn't produce any errors for me. The resulting plot at the end shows a pretty poor correlation (just speaking visually here) to the test set. How can I improve the performance of the mapping and prediction? Here are some of the data

I have a data set with 10 variables, and about 8000 instances (or objects/rows/samples). In addition I have one more ('class') variable that I have about 10 instances for, but for which I wish to impute values for. I am a little confused how to go about doing this, mostly as I'm not well-versed in it. Do I train the SOM with a data object that contains just the first 10 variables

Hello, I have produced some segmented regressions with the segmented package by Viggo Mutteo. I have some example data and code below. I want to annotate the individual segments with the slope parameter (actually it would be nicer to annotate with 1000*slope and add some small amount of text as well). How can I do it? Reading the docs for segmented I can access all of the slope parameters via a

I am having difficulty understanding how I would constrain a data set by filtering out 'records' based on certain criteria. Using SQL I could query using 'select * from my.data where LithClass in ('sand', 'clay')' or some such. Using subset, there seem to be ghosts left behind (that is, all of the LithClass *.Labels* remain after subset) > dput(tcc)