search for: hapra

hi everyone, I am planning on creating a local SAN via NFS(v4) and several redundant nodes. I have been using DRBD on linux before and now am asking whether some of you have experience on on-demand network filesystem mirrors. I have yet little Solaris sysadmin know how, but i am interesting whether there is an on-demand support for sending snapshots. I.e. not via a cron job, but via a

>>>>> "Jakob" == Jakob Praher <jp at hapra.at> writes: Jakob> I would definitely like to look into it. I'll send it in private email. Jakob> Yes very much! How did you find writing it directly in Jakob> SSA-form. Actually I used what Chris called "the alloca trick"... the JIT doesn't really generate SSA for...

hi all, i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs recovery if disk errors occur. currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup: 2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks) 8 sata disks, same size, same type i have two pools: a) rootpool b) datapool the rootpool is a mirrored pool, where every disk has a slice (the s0, which is 5 % of the whole disk) and this

...rns out. I've been stuck thinking about > this for two months. So you are currently compiling class files to LLVM modules and you place the Java .class file inforamtion in the LLVM bytecode too? Or am I missing somethign here? > --Jakob > > > On 2/25/06, Jakob Praher <jp at hapra.at> wrote: > >>Hi Reid, >> >>Reid Spencer schrieb: >> >>>I have some thoughts on this too .. >>> >> >>Great! >> >> >>>On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I...

hi Tom, I am really glad that someone has found time to step into that :-). Tom Tromey wrote: > I recently wrote an LLVM-based JIT plugin for libgcj and I thought > it'd be worthwhile to mention it here. > > It is in cvs on sourceforge, but afaics anonymous cvs there is pretty > broken at the moment... so if you want a copy, ask and I will email it > to you. wow. that is

...compiled functions converted to native. In the short term I think I'll simply use the class file format in my native compiled classes and wait and see how this turns out. I've been stuck thinking about this for two months. Thanks for the ideas. Mike On 2/25/06, Jakob Praher <jp at hapra.at> wrote: > Hi Reid, > > Reid Spencer schrieb: > > I have some thoughts on this too .. > > > Great! > > > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > > > >>I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many information >...

Hi Reid, Reid Spencer schrieb: > I have some thoughts on this too .. > Great! > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many information >>is done by some runtime std::map<Value*,foo> stuff. Which is really >>handy at runtime, but I *had* serialization in mind when I was thinking

I recently wrote an LLVM-based JIT plugin for libgcj and I thought it'd be worthwhile to mention it here. It is in cvs on sourceforge, but afaics anonymous cvs there is pretty broken at the moment... so if you want a copy, ask and I will email it to you. Basically I hacked libgcj to (optionally) dynamically load JIT module at startup. If a JIT is loaded then bytecode is passed to it rather

hi all, I have to do some benchmarking and charting. I wanted to know if someone has a simple enough benchmark, that contains branches/calls/loops. Something mathematical would be fine. But as I said it should consist of more than one big function :-). I want to benchmark a dynamic instrumentation framework and need something to compare it against the uninstrumented software. It would be

hi people, since I often have the need to comfortable browse the llvm sources, i set up a site (using opengrok from solaris) for browsing the sources. I have to pay for the line, so added some ads (i hope they are not too anoying). But perhaps you find it useful. In future I could add support for the whole repo (currently it is 1.7). the URL: http://sbrowser.pragmatical.org/llvm/ -- Jakob

hi all, i am writing a set of benchmark tests for binary translation of llvm bytecodes as well as aot translation of llvm bytecode. i am using the llvm-test sytle makefiles. i write a special TEST.benchmark.Makefile that does the work. i have good support (toolwise) for measuring runtime: - time(1) is a nice utility for measuring time (under linux it should do more but does not it :-() -

hi all, I am sorry but i can not attend the developer's meeting. But reading through the page it sounds like a very interesting venue. So it would be a great thing if we could have slides as pdfs available on the web site. thanks in advance -- Jakob ps: it is funny that most compiler suites are not named after something very interesting. gcc, icc, ... are all something like xxx compiler

hi all, i surely overlooked something. but i am currently trying to do some benchmarking stuff with llvm. in my thesis i was using llvm-1.5 (i did some extension work, which i would have to frontport now). But unfortunately 1.5 is for some benchmarks unstable (at least on my box) such that llc sigsegvs sometimes, etc. So I wanted to give 1.9 a go and build that on the my intel mac book. I did

hi all, I have used LLVM extensively over the last 2 years. I have realized a so called change framework that based on the LLVM framework. Basically it is a framework that augments the JIT to understand "changes", such that a mutator process can formulate changes in a change language (inspired by DTrace's D), which is too compiled to LLVM and sent to the application process.

hi all, out of a matter of fact I am still using llvm version 1.5. I don't know how 1.6 works in this matter. When translating a complex c application to llvm bytecodes, some semantics are lost: Take for isntance the interesting attribute to put a variable in the thread local data section (.tdata), this would be interesting to have in llvm. like in GCC you write: int x

hi Chris! thanks for your reply. First of all I did not know about the history with the Annotation stuff. Annotable for me was a way how one could realize this things. So as I see it right now - it is more that Annotable will completly vanish soon. This is interesting to me. Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jakob Praher wrote: > >> When translating a complex c