search for: haos

Fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF; generated by INTO) and int 3(#BP) instruction emulation. For INTn (CD ib), it should use type 4 (software interrupt). For INT3 (CC; NOT CD ib with ib=3) and INTO (CE; NOT CD ib with ib=4), it should use type 6 (software exception). For other exceptions (#DE, #DB, #BR, #UD, #NM, #TS, #NP, #SS, #GP, #PF, #MF, #AC, #MC, and #XM), it

I'm sorry that I should remove the comment. In fact my question is about the "float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*", why we use this kind of return type instead of just "float (i32)*". Thanks a lot. Hao On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> %4 = call float (i32)* (float (i32)*)* @get_ptr(float (i32)* @a1)

"float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*" is not a return type. According to the description of the 'call' instruction in LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_call) this is a signature of the pointer to function value being invoked (which includes the return type). In your case the full signature is printed because get_ptr returns a pointer to

Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi

Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:19 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > SHEN Hao wrote: >> Thanks a lot for your answer. >> As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind >> of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take >> all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution

Changes from v1: - Define new struct hvm_trap to represent information of trap, include instruction length. - Renames hvm_inject_exception to hvm_inject_trap. Then define a couple of wrappers around that function for existing callers, so that their parameter lists actually *shrink*. This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP),

tools/firmware: remove "_PS0/3" Method Do not expose the ACPI power management "_PS0/3" Method to guest firmware. According to section 3.4 of the APCI specification 4.0, PCI device control the device power through its own specification but not through APCI. Qemu pushes "_PS0/3" to guest will cause a mess between ACPI PM and PCI PM as a result of incorrect ACPI table

Hi, Opus team I'm Huang Hao and trouble you again. When I used the OpusRepacketizer as Jean-Marc mentioned, I got a result (maybe problem I'm not sure) that perplexes me, please give me some comments. The result be described as below: First(all init which are needed I have done), I used opus_encode() to get the encoded data successfully. The encoder control parameters are set: VBR=0,

This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP), INTn instruction emulation. Introduce new function vmx_inject_sw_exception() which deliver the software excetion, software interrupt and privileged software exception. Split hardware exception as a seperate function(old function vmx_inject_hw_exception()). Also Passed down intruction length

Dear all, I compiled c program with llvm and found something strange with function pointer as following small example . ------------- In C Code -------------- float a (int value) { return value + 1; }; typedef float (*funcptr_t) (int); funcptr_t get_ptr(funcptr_t p) { return p; } float result = get_ptr(a)(4); ------------- In LLVM Code -------------- %4 = call float (i32)* (float

Hello, I have a vector (v) with 6 columns and 2000 rows. I am trying to do one sample t.test for each row (I know this sounds crazy) and put the p.values into the 7th column. I know I can access the p.value via t.test(v[i,])[3]$p.value; I know I can do t.test on the row by apply(v, 1, t.test), but I just couldn't figure out how to fit them together. I'd very appreciate your help!!

...him. When he joined the 610 Office in October of 2000, there were over 40 people in one office. Hao Fengjuns boss handed him a thick stack of records, including details about the supposed crimes of Tianjin Falun Gong practitioners and the CCPs guidelines about Falun Gong. Haos boss asked the newly transferred 27-year-old young man to learn, study and memorize the materials in order to build a solid foundation for future assignments requiring him to persecute Falun Gong. They tried to brainwash me. It goes on every day, Hao Fengjun said. I...

Hi there, I just found that if an user is assigned in the "admin users", and if the user grab a file from window to samba share, the file will be owned by root from unix view. I am believing this is a bug. The samba version I am using is 2.2.4. Weixing Hao (631) 858-6341 Forest Labs -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Thanks a lot for your answer. As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution is less performance efficient, but I would like to have it for my llvm assembly level modification works. But anyway, thanks for you help. Hao

Dear R-help, Is it possible to use win.metafile() on *nix versions of R? I tried R 2.1.1 on FreeBSD and R 1.9.0 on redhat with no success. I need to give some graphs generated in R to my boss so that he can modify them in Powerpoint to fit he style of his presentation. Recommendations on other methods are appreciated as well. Hao -- : Hao Chen, Ph.D. : Instructor : Department of

Hi, Can anyone help me understand that LLVM IR has "target independence" ? 1. When we talk about "target", we mean something like Instruction Set Architecture ? 2. The front-end may generate IR code such as x86_fp80, so the IR is actually not fully target-independent? It contains information about the target, and the front-end should also be aware of this? Thank you! Hao

hi Hao, I started to upstream and the second patch is stalled under review now. - Elena -----Original Message----- From: Hao Liu [mailto:haoliuts at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 05:56 To: Demikhovsky, Elena Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Indexed Load and Store Intrinsics - proposal Hi Elena, I think such intrinsics are very useful. Do you have any plan to

SHEN Hao wrote: > Thanks a lot for your answer. > As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind > of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take > all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution > is less performance efficient, but I would like to have it for my llvm > assembly level modification

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> Is there anyone who knows well i80 data type? Is there any >> corresponding data type >> for X86 processor? uint80_t or int80_t for gcc? > > no, there is no native processor support for i80. GCC does not have > a direct equivalent to i80. However if you declare a