Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "handwavi".
Did you mean:
handwavy
2014 Dec 01
4
NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away.
That?s the ideal, anyway.
What often happens in reality is either:
1. They give us incorrect static IP info,
2014 Dec 02
0
NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
On 12/02/2014 10:35 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away.
>
> That?s the ideal, anyway.
>
> What often happens
2015 Jul 29
0
[LLVMdev] The Trouble with Triples
Hi Daniel,
I'm not sure I agree with the basic idea of using the target triple as a
way of encoding all of the pieces of target data as a string. I think in a
number of cases what we need to do is either open up API to the back end to
specify things, or encode the information into the IR when it's different
from the generic triple. Ideally the triple will have enough information to
do
2015 Jul 30
3
[LLVMdev] The Trouble with Triples
Hi Eric,
Thanks for getting back to me on this.
> I'm not sure I agree with the basic idea of using the target triple as a way of
> encoding all of the pieces of target data as a string. I think in a number of
> cases what we need to do is either open up API to the back end to specify things,
> or encode the information into the IR when it's different from the generic triple.
2010 Sep 14
2
[LLVMdev] ARM MC .s status?
Hi Jim!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I've just started actively working on this. Coordinating to get things moving even faster sounds great! Can you elaborate a bit on your ultimate goals and use cases are? That might help us better determine a natural breakdown and separation of tasks. Evan and Chris may have
2015 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] The Trouble with Triples
Hi Daniel,
> (from the context, you might have meant 'tuple' where you've written
> 'triple'. I'm answering based on the assumption you meant 'triple')
>
>
I did mean what I wrote.
> The GNU triple is already used as a way of encoding a large amount of the
> target data in a string but unfortunately, while this data is passed
> throughout
2015 Jul 08
5
[LLVMdev] The Trouble with Triples
Hi,
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969, Eric asked me to explain the wider context of the TargetTuple object that was replacing Triple on llvmdev so here it is.
Before I start, I'm sure I don't know the full extent of GNU triple ambiguity and lack of canonicity. Additional examples are welcome.
The Problem
As you know, LLVM uses a GNU Triple is as a target description that can be relied
2010 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] ARM MC .s status?
Hi Jason,
I've just started actively working on this. Coordinating to get things moving even faster sounds great! Can you elaborate a bit on your ultimate goals and use cases are? That might help us better determine a natural breakdown and separation of tasks. Evan and Chris may have suggestions there, too, as I know they're both very interested in getting this stuff fleshed out and
2010 Sep 14
3
[LLVMdev] ARM MC .s status?
Hi everyone, Rafael has graciously given me some pointers for helping
out on the ARM/MC .s emission infrastructure, and I am volunteering to
do so.
It looks like as of yesterday, the MC obj emitter for ARM is also
incomplete (there does not seem to be a ARMMCCodeEmitter.cpp, for
example)
So if anyone already has started looking into this, I'd like to pool
info so as to not step on toes.
Any
2015 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] The Trouble with Triples
> > (from the context, you might have meant 'tuple' where you've written 'triple'. I'm answering based on the assumption you meant 'triple')
> I did mean what I wrote.
I thought I ought to check since it's very easy to mix up triples and tuples and the context sounded off. I'm glad I picked the right assumption.
> > The proposed TargetTuple
2019 Apr 17
5
Disable combining of loads and stores in instcombine
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 5:02 AM, Arsenault, Matthew via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> This won’t happen with volatile load/store
This is mostly true today, but AFAICT the LLVM memory model doesn’t actually offer this guarantee. It merely says that LLVM treats volatile like C / C++ treats volatile… which isn’t much of a guarantee because C / C++ volatile doesn’t
2010 Sep 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 75, Issue 32
2010/9/15 <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to
> llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu
>
> You can