search for: handwav

I know this is quite a handwaving, stupid question, but I don't know where else to ask it and maybe somebody here can at least point me into the right direction, because I'm stuck. I have a program package that were using here (OpenFOAM for those who know it). My problem is that when I compile and link this package on C...

...t;arcfour-hmac-md5" choice applies already in AD2000 -- so howcome it works? (A) The 2k AD supports other types as well and makes peace with MIT krb5 whereas 2k3 AD has been lambasted out of such fraternizing habits, (B) The 2k3 AD would support other types after the proper Magic Handwaving, i. e., tweaking of some well chosen registry keys. Does anybody know to enlighten us on this? It seems heimdal-0.6 and MIT 1.3.1 do support arcfour-hmac-md5; tomorrow I will journey up the Repent, Recompile, Restart mountain and then hopefully be one Microsoft wiser. Magnus

...TST) makes > > the network unusable. > > > No, I haven't had the pleasure recently, so I'm not aware of what you're talking about. You said there is no downside. I've demonstrated a situation people can face right now where it can make a website unusable. Don't handwave away the cost of forcing HTTPS, it adds overhead for all involved parties. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for properly supporting HTTPS everywhere, but it is not without downsides. Joerg

...e request: please can we have support for messages stored in mbox files, but folders containing both messages and folders. I think this could be done for a folder called e.g. dovecot-list by having an mbox file called dovecot-list and a directory called dovecot-list.folder (or whatever, says he handwaving away name clashes which can be worked around like they are in maildirs). This may be a subset or variant of http://wiki.dovecot.org/FeatMboxMaildir Cheers, John.

...t.support.p30ple.with.sp311ing.pr0blemz? FWIW, the source distribution of unfsd contains a file called BUGS which even the attention span challenged have a hard time overlooking. This file contains fairly detailed instructions on how to submit a bug report. Concerning the problem Mariusz has been handwaving about, this is a serious issue. It's got nothing to do with realpath(), however. The true cause of the problem is that the code relies on the total length of a path to not exceed PATH_MAX + NAME_MAX. I'm not sure whether this is a common Unix problem, but at least on Linux, PATH_MAX mere...

On Sep 2, 2014 11:53 PM, "Rusty Russell" <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> writes: > > There really are virtio devices that are pieces of silicon and not > > figments of a hypervisor's imagination [1]. > > Hi Andy, > > As you're discovering, there's a reason no one has done the DMA

On Sep 2, 2014 11:53 PM, "Rusty Russell" <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> writes: > > There really are virtio devices that are pieces of silicon and not > > figments of a hypervisor's imagination [1]. > > Hi Andy, > > As you're discovering, there's a reason no one has done the DMA

Hi, Is this method broken in R? I am using it to find roots of the following function: f(x) = 2.5*exp(-0.5*(2*0.045 - x)) + 2.5*exp(-0.045) + 2.5*exp(-1.5*x) - 100 It is giving an answer of -38.4762403 which is not even close (f(x) = 2.903809e+25 for x=-38.4762403). The answer should be around 0.01-0.1. This function should converge.. Even for a simple function like f(x) = exp(-x) * x, it gives

Hi based on some code from Thomas Petzoldt, I have a question: --- opar <- par(mfrow = c(2,4)) slices <- 8 m <- matrix(runif(100),10,10) my.list <- list() for (slice in 1:slices) { my.list[[slice]] <- m } for (slice in 1:slices) { x <- 1*(1:25) y <- 1*(1:25) z <- my.list[[slice]] image(list(x = 0:9, y = 0:9, z = z)) } par(opar) #restore device

Hi I have a table with four columns and 3 rows. I calculated the average for each columns as average (A), average (B), average (C) and average (D), then calculate the relative ratio as average (A)/average (B), and average (C)/average (D). I would like to know how can I calculate the significance between the two ratios. Thanks, Meng [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ciFi changed to SyFy; bored marketing > people trying to 'add value'. > The main reason for the switch to LO from OO is Oracle Corporation's buyout of Sun. Shortly after that event the principal developers of OO left that project and forked LibreOffice. Oracle went through some handwaving exercise about being committed to open source but development of OO stalled, either by design or neglect. Evential Oracle turned OO over to Apache.org but by then a large portion of the OO audience had already switched to LO and never looked back. OO has had its first release since being adopt...

...gt; > At low contention the cmpxchg won't have to be retried (much) so using > it won't be a problem and you get to have arbitrary atomic ops. Peter, the difference between an atomic op and *no* atomic op is huge. And Waiman posted numbers for the optimization. Why do you argue with handwaving and against numbers? Linus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140228/b13b88b0/attachment.html>

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:07:48PM -0500, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > But beyond that: there's no downside. Why should *anyone* continue to serve > http traffic? It's just all around better and safer to require https, for > everything, always. I take you haven't tried to use WiFi at UK airports or coaches recently? There are a lot of other places with completely

...virtio devices via IOMMU by accident? > > If the answers are both "yes", then x86 is going to be able to use > virtio+IOMMU, so PPC looks like the odd one out. Otherwise it looks > like we're really going to want to stick with the "ignore IOMMU" rule > until (handwave future), and we make an exception for Xen. There's a third option: try to make virtio-mmio work everywhere (except s390), at least in the long run. This other benefits: it makes minimal hypervisors simpler, I think it'll get rid of the limits on the number of virtio devices in a system....

...virtio devices via IOMMU by accident? > > If the answers are both "yes", then x86 is going to be able to use > virtio+IOMMU, so PPC looks like the odd one out. Otherwise it looks > like we're really going to want to stick with the "ignore IOMMU" rule > until (handwave future), and we make an exception for Xen. There's a third option: try to make virtio-mmio work everywhere (except s390), at least in the long run. This other benefits: it makes minimal hypervisors simpler, I think it'll get rid of the limits on the number of virtio devices in a system....

...that I've changed the SID (or something). When I try to rejoin the domain (automatically created accounts using the above config) I get the following error message: 'Unable to update local security in order to join domain' I've done a web search on this, and while there are vague handwaving explanations of what's happened, there's no actual solution offerred. So if anyone can give me a pointer or two on this I'd appreciate it. Cheers, Waider. -- waider@waider.ie / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. Derrick says, "Well, there are altar girls there. But it's a...

...rs will end up using virtio devices via IOMMU by accident? If the answers are both "yes", then x86 is going to be able to use virtio+IOMMU, so PPC looks like the odd one out. Otherwise it looks like we're really going to want to stick with the "ignore IOMMU" rule until (handwave future), and we make an exception for Xen. Cheers, Rusty.

In certain situations sftp download speed can be much less than that of scp. After many days of trying to find the cause finally I found it to be the tcp nagle algorithm, which if turned off with TCP_NODELAY eliminates the problem. Now I see it being discussed back in 2002, but it still unresolved in openssh-4.2 :( Simple solution would be to add a NoDelay option to ssh which sftp would set.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:42:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+ old = xchg(&qlock->lock_wait, _QSPINLOCK_WAITING|_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED); > >>+ > >>+ if (old == 0) { > >>+ /* > >>+ * Got the lock, can clear the waiting bit now > >>+ */ > >>+ smp_u8_store_release(&qlock->wait, 0); > > > >So we just did an

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:42:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+ old = xchg(&qlock->lock_wait, _QSPINLOCK_WAITING|_QSPINLOCK_LOCKED); > >>+ > >>+ if (old == 0) { > >>+ /* > >>+ * Got the lock, can clear the waiting bit now > >>+ */ > >>+ smp_u8_store_release(&qlock->wait, 0); > > > >So we just did an