search for: handlearg

...when necessary like this: LowerArguments(BasicBlock *LLVMBB) { // code for traditional target ........... for (Function::arg_iterator I = F.arg_begin(), E = F.arg_end(); I != E; ++I, ++Idx) { if (TLI.isStrangeTarget()) { //code for my strange target TLI.HandleArgment(...); continue; } // code for traditional target ....... } // code for traditional target ............. } thank you for any suggestion

...upport.so.9svn+0x1753e8) #2 0x0000ffff9ebb9540 SignalHandler(int) (/clang/build/aarch64/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.9svn+0x175540) #3 0x0000ffff9edac6c0 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x6c0) #4 0x000000000042a098 std::_Function_handler<bool (llvm::objcopy::elf::SectionBase const&), llvm::objcopy::elf::handleArgs(llvm::objcopy::CopyConfig const&, llvm::objcopy::elf::Object&, llvm::objcopy::elf::Reader const&, llvm::objcopy::elf::ElfType)::'lambda2'(llvm::objcopy::elf::SectionBase const&)>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&, llvm::objcopy::elf::SectionBase const&) (/clang/bu...

...function, and it can return correctly. The code snippet may be as follows: ... CCState CCInfo(F.getCallingConv(), F.isVarArg(), MF, ArgLocs, F.getContext()); TLI.analyzeOutputArgs(MF, CCInfo, Outs, true, nullptr); RISCVValueHandler RetHandler(MIRBuilder, MF.getRegInfo(), Ret); RetHandler.handleArg(ArgLocs, RetInfos); ... In order to reduce duplicated code as much as possible, and reuse part of code from "TargetLowering" for GlobalIsel, the access specifiers for some functions in RISCVTargetLowering need be changed, like "analyzeOutputArgs". I have made a separate patch...

Hey everyone! Objcopy is a powerful tool that allows one to modify object files in various manners, for example, modify symbols / symbol tables or copy / remove particular parts of a binary. It also serves as a basis for the strip tool. Currently, llvm-objcopy only supports ELF files while binutils' objcopy can handle Mach-O files as well. Besides extending the existing tool to support Mach-O

For those of you out there using export/collect (which we really need to come up with a better name for...), can you test the current SVN code? I''m mostly wondering if the performance is any better. To use it, you''ll have to remove your current database, since the database schema is significantly changed. I''m getting what looks like an additional 25% reduction