Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "handle_incoming_sdp".
Did you mean:
handle_incoming_pdu
2017 Jun 18
2
asterisk 13.16. - sigseg during negotiation
...ce \365>, src=0x20, size=1025) at res_pjsip.c:4147
#1 0x00007fb9f0b02334 in negotiate_incoming_sdp_stream (session=0x7fba3c031200, session_media=<value optimized out>, sdp=<value optimized out>, stream=<value optimized out>)
at res_pjsip_t38.c:703
#2 0x00007fba0499ccf6 in handle_incoming_sdp (session=0x7fba3c031200, sdp=0x7fba3c0adfb8) at res_pjsip_session.c:243
#3 0x00007fba0499e650 in session_inv_on_rx_offer (inv=0x7fba3c0504e8, offer=0x7fba3c0adfb8) at res_pjsip_session.c:3009
#4 0x00007fba44b1b501 in inv_check_sdp_in_incoming_msg (inv=0x7fba3c0504e8, tsx=0x7fba08006878, rdata=0x7...
2017 Jun 05
3
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 04:26 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 at 06:29 PM, Joshua Colp wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output
> >> in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own
> >> debug code to see why things
2017 Jun 15
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On 06/14/2017 at 10:17 PM, Joshua Colp wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, at 05:09 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> I can now say, that asterisk / pjsip seams to work *mostly* as expected.
>> Just one exception - and that's the package in question, which can't be
>> seen in tcpdump.
>>
>> I extended the above patch by adding