search for: hamon

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how > important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a > commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding > Boost as it has a bad name in some qu...

On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Dominic Hamon wrote: >> Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder >>>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the >>>> case, I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that co...

Roman Levenstein wrote: > - possibility of using 3rd party libs like Boost (or their parts) in LLVM > There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, for

me22 wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how >> important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a >> commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding >> Boost as it h...

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it > is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its > usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking > immediately. Boost is a neb...

...ing savePlot() which from what I saw can only save one page/device a the time. Is there an easy way to save all the plots? or should I use a loop and cut my dataframe along my conditioning variables to make different calls and then save 1 page per call? Thanks for your help, Katell -- Katell HAMON Doctorante / PhD student IFREMER-Brest Departement d'?conomie maritime / Marine Economics Department Technopole Brest Iroise B.P. 70 29280 Plouzan? France

On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Greene wrote: >>> Since I think it really is a part of the LLVM internals, I don't >>> think >>> that mangling it with a prefix is the right way to go. This would >>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally >>> detrimental. >>

Dominic Hamon wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder >>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, >>> I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old >>> non-folding...

On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Hello llvm dev peeps > > I would like to use an LLVMBuilder pointer as a base pointer to > reference either an LLVMBuilder or an LLVMFoldingBuilder. As the > methods > in the Folding builder have the same names as the base class, I > thought > about submitting...

Duncan Sands wrote: >> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder and >> rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, I'd >> argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old non-folding >> functionality for debugging purposes. >> > > this plan sounds good to me. However it's not clear to me how

Full_Name: Katell Hamon Version: 2.2.1 OS: windows Submission from: (NULL) (130.226.135.149) I have a problem in : xyplot(df[,v] ~ df$year , [....] ) the error is "Error in df[, v] : object is not subsettable" but this used to run well with ver...

On Apr 11, 2008, at 02:19, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > >> And there were. updated patches attached. > > Looking good. One big comment: Please attach patches to email > instead of including them inline. Thunderbird and Mail are once again conspiring against Chris. The fix is to make Thunderbird attach attachments instead...

Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, > for including work that is not safe for commercial users to take on. Ie, > there are so many contributors, and their contribution tracking has been > poor in th...

Am Sonntag, den 18.05.2008, 20:39 -0400 schrieb me22: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > > It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it > > is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its > > usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking > > immedia...

On Jul 7, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > I completely agree with this point, but then aren't you trading off > one aspect of clarity for another? It is a problem with the C > preprocessor that hits many projects and the equivalent to the > namespace solution for macros is to add a prefix specific to the > proje...

Hello llvm dev peeps I would like to use an LLVMBuilder pointer as a base pointer to reference either an LLVMBuilder or an LLVMFoldingBuilder. As the methods in the Folding builder have the same names as the base class, I thought about submitting a patch whereby the base class methods would become virtual. However, the base class methods return specific types while the Folding builder, for

On May 14, 2008, at 4:46 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz >> <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: >> >>> Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >>> >>>> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a...

Bill Wendling wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >> >>> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what exactly is >>> LLVM's autoconf doing that "autoconf shouldn't do if properly set up"?

Hi, There is a discussion thread on llvm-commits list about a possibility of using custom memory allocators for STL to improve the performance and reduce the memory pressure of STL containers, e.g. std::set. I thought that this discussion may be interesting for a wider audience and therefore I re-post the messages on llvm-dev as well. It would be interesting to hear what others think about -

...and works well, I would upgrade the primary DC. Is this possible yet? Happy testing alphas if good documentation is provided. We do not have any replication in other offices at the moment (using basic workgroups...) so not much could go wrong. And btw: Happy new year to the samba team! -- Yann HAMON Systems Manager Oxford Archaeology: Exploring the Human Journey http://thehumanjourney.net ------ Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information.