search for: haleys

Are you sure using conv=sync is what you want? I normally use conv=fdatasync, I'll look up the difference between the two and see if it affects your test. -b ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Haley" <phaley at mit.edu> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> > Cc: "Ravishankar N" <ravishankar at redhat.com>,

Hi Guys, I was wondering what our next steps should be to solve the slow write times. Recently I was debugging a large code and writing a lot of output at every time step. When I tried writing to our gluster disks, it was taking over a day to do a single time step whereas if I had the same program (same hardware, network) write to our nfs disk the time per time-step was about 45 minutes.

Hi Ben, Sorry this took so long, but we had a real-time forecasting exercise last week and I could only get to this now. Backend Hardware/OS: * Much of the information on our back end system is included at the top of http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-April/030529.html * The specific model of the hard disks is SeaGate ENTERPRISE CAPACITY V.4 6TB

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Pat Haley <phaley at mit.edu> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Decided to try another tests of gluster mounted via FUSE vs gluster > mounted via NFS, this time using the software we run in production (i.e. > our ocean model writing a netCDF file). > > gluster mounted via NFS the run took 2.3 hr > > gluster mounted via FUSE: the run took

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Pat Haley <phaley at mit.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > Today we experimented with some of the FUSE options that we found in the > list. > > Changing these options had no effect: > > gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-max-file-size 2MB > gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-refresh-timeout 4 > gluster

Hi, Today we experimented with some of the FUSE options that we found in the list. Changing these options had no effect: gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-max-file-size 2MB gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-refresh-timeout 4 gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-size 256MB gluster volume set test-volume performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB gluster

Hi All, Decided to try another tests of gluster mounted via FUSE vs gluster mounted via NFS, this time using the software we run in production (i.e. our ocean model writing a netCDF file). gluster mounted via NFS the run took 2.3 hr gluster mounted via FUSE: the run took 44.2 hr The only problem with using gluster mounted via NFS is that it does not respect the group write permissions which

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Pat Haley <phaley at mit.edu> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> Today we experimented with some of the FUSE options that we found in the >> list. >> >> Changing these options had no effect: >> >>

I am trying to compile the certified-asterisk-11.6-cert5 code and when I try to start it and then go into the console I am getting the error message "asterisk dead but subsys locked". Can anyone help with why this is happening? I have never seen this before. This is a fresh install on a new server CentOS 6.5. Thanks, Scott Haley IS Voice Projects Team Edward Jones Investments Phone:

Hi, We recently installed glusterfs 3.3.1. We have a 3 brick gluster system running that was being successfully mounted earlier. Yesterday we experienced a power outage and now after rebooting our systems, we are unable to mount this gluster file system. On the gluster client, a df -h command shows 41TB out of 55TB, while an ls command shows broken links for directories and missing files.

I have a SIP trunk from my Asterisk server to an Avaya CM server. If I place calls inbound, everything works fine. If I place calls outbound, originating from the Asterisk box, everything works fine (I have done this with the use of the .call files). If I setup an extension with the findme-followme feature and have it try to hair-pin a call back out the same trunk to the Avaya, I get a

Hi, We have recently upgraded our gluster to 3.2.5 and have encountered the following error. Gluster seems somehow confused about one of the files it should be serving up, specifically /projects/philex/PE/2010/Oct18/arch07/BalbacFull_250_200_03Mar_3.png If I go to that directory and simply do an ls *.png I get ls: BalbacFull_250_200_03Mar_3.png: Structure needs cleaning (along with a listing

Hi We have been trying back-up a glusterfs (v3.1.4) area using the Tivoli TSM software to an off-site area. The back-up keeps failing with the following typical error messages 06/14/2011 22:22:58 ANS1587W I/O error reading file attributes for: /gdata/projects/philex/OAG/2011/May16/mdor3km10/coast_den2.in. errno = 22, Invalid argument 06/14/2011 22:22:59 ANS4007E Error processing

Andrew Haley wrote: > Nick Lewycky wrote: >> 2009/6/30 Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com <mailto:aph at redhat.com>> >> >> Nick Lewycky wrote: >> > I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on >> ARM: >> >> Yes. It's just a matter of defining __sync_val_compare_and_swap_4: >> >>

Hi, We are running a cluster under CentOS 6.6. We recently attached a new NAS device, running CentOS 6.8 and rsync'd our user file system to it. We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). We copied over the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files from our front-end server to our NAS server. If we log in to the NAS server we see the files owned by their

Hi, On 07/07/2017 06:16 AM, Pat Haley wrote: > > Hi All, > > A follow-up question. I've been looking at various pages on nfs-ganesha > & gluster. Is there a version of nfs-ganesha that is recommended for > use with > > glusterfs 3.7.11 built on Apr 27 2016 14:09:22 > CentOS release 6.8 (Final) For glusterfs 3.7, nfs-ganesha-2.3-* version can be used. I see

This is x86_64. I have a problem where an absolute memory load define i32 @foo() { entry: %0 = load i32* inttoptr (i64 12704196 to i32*) ; <i32> [#uses=1] ret i32 %0 } generates incorrect code on LLVM 2.4: 0x7ffff6d54010: mov 0xc1d9c4(%rip),%eax # 0x7ffff79719da 0x7ffff6d54016: retq should be 0x7ffff6d54010: mov 0xc1d9c4, %eax 0x7ffff6d54016: retq

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> Right, so that part should be trivial. So, does the array bounds check >> elimination already work? If it does, that will considerably reduce >> the work that Andre needs to do. To say the least... >> >> > > Trivial bounds check elimination already work, such as tab[2] = 1; > tab[1] = 2 (the second

Nick Lewycky wrote: > 2009/6/30 Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com <mailto:aph at redhat.com>> > > Nick Lewycky wrote: > > I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on > ARM: > > Yes. It's just a matter of defining __sync_val_compare_and_swap_4: > >

Hi Soumya, (1) In http://mseas.mit.edu/download/phaley/GlusterUsers/TestNFSmount/ I've placed the following 2 log files etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log gdata.log The first has repeated messages about nfs disconnects. The second had the <fuse_mnt_direcotry>.log name (but not much information). (2) About the gluster-NFS native server: do you know where we can find documentation on