search for: hajdarev

Hi! I just started using RSpec and have some question that I couldn''t find answers to. If I have a result that can have two valid values, is there a better way of writing the following assertion? [value1,value2].should_include actual Is there a more elegant way of performing should_satisfy on a collection, for example I currently use something like collection.each {|x|

Hi! It seems that migration doesn''t use single transcation to execute the needed migrations for the database upgrade, so if I have database at version 5, and I wrote some migrations 6..10, and error occurs while executing migration 7, the database stays in state 6? I also think that migration taks could use some more verbosity, for example if migration fails, there''s no

Hi! Is it possible to render the action within the after_filter method, or is the rendering performed before? I have something like this: class FooController after_filter :send def a @content=... end def b @content=.. end protected def send send_data(@content,...) end end However, when calling the action a or b, the @content doesn''t get sent, but instead

Hi! I''m writing a datagrid plugin and would like to render the datagrid using a .rhtml template. However, I''d like to avoid placing this template in app/views/shared, but it should reside somewhere within vendor/plugins/datagrid/... Any ideas? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! I''m using Migration to define my database schema and these "ALTER TABLE t ADD FOREIGN KEY..." look really ugly - that''s why I wanted to ask it would be possible to simply add add_foreign_key method to ActiveRecord? Are there any reasons this isn''t yet implemented? Greetings, Esad -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! Is there an option that I could provide to the spec runner that would make it stop after it encounters the first spec that fails? Esad

Hi! Is there a nicer way of writing File.should be_exist(''filename'')? File.should exist(''foo'') throws NoMethodError in ''specification'' undefined method `exist'' for #<#<Class:0x3ec1c30>:0x3ebc308> (I''m using rspec from the trunk) Esad

Hi! The following example doesn''t work for me: http://pastie.caboo.se/41732 However, if the call to msg() happens in the specify block after the expecation and not in the setup, it will pass. Why is this? I thought the setup method was there to actually ''construct'' the context and the specifications are some kind of "postconditions" that only need to be

Hello rspec-users, I''ve encountered a strange bug in rspec, but it may be me who is wrong. I''m running latest version from the trunk (r1678) of both rspec and rspec_on_rails. Please consider the following model: class Url < ActiveRecord::Base def after_save Contact.create!(:primary_email => ''user at example.com'') raise

Would it make sense for rake db:migrate to support creating databases if it is not found, with blessing from user to prevent typos, or as an additional command line switch. Or am I just being too lazy? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! I''m thinking of implementing datagrid like functionality for showing data (models) in grids so that I don''t have to re-invent the view/controller for each table I need. There are number of parameters that need to be customizable: column titles, row style depending on the data (i.e. showing all rows with balance<0 in red), is column sortable, sort-algorithm etc. To

I am a bit of a rails and rspec noob. I am trying to use rspec in conjunction with CruiseControlrb. When I run a cruise build having spec errors, the build does not indicate a failure. I have tried to track down why this is the case, and my best guess is that the spec task is kicking off the spec via a ruby() method in rake, and that ruby method does not propagate my spec failure back to

mini@mini:~/Sites/music_library$ rake db:migrate rake aborted! couldn''t parse YAML at line 28 column 6 /home/mini/my_gems/gems/railties-3.2.9/lib/rails/application/configuration.rb:115:in `database_configuration'' /home/mini/my_gems/gems/activerecord-3.2.9/lib/active_record/railtie.rb:78:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Railtie>''

Hi! Is it possible to run unit tests when no database is configured? Rails recipes mentions putting following piece of code in a file within lib/tasks/ [:test_units,:test_functional,:recent].each do |name| Rake::Task.lookup(name).prerequisites.clear end However this seem to be out-of-date, as task lookup in rake according to RDoc is now done using Rake:Task[name]. But after I updated the

Hello list, As you may probably know, Ruby Central is one of the organizations participating on the Google Summer of Code contest (http://code.google.com/soc/ruby/about.html), and I was thinking about applying with some rails-development projects? Is there anyone here thinking about doing the same as I that together we could build something more useful in the end. Greetings, Esad --

Hi list! I''m trying to add a rake task or a command line switch to the existing task to run Tk unit test runner instead of console one. Yet I couldn''t figure out where this magic is happening, i.e. where console runner is initialized and run? And yes, wouldn''t something like rake task "all_test" be more appropriate then default? -- Posted via

Maybe someone will find this useful: I have a relatively complex (My)SQL query that results from having many many :conditions and :includes, and MySQL seems to apply a wrong join order so I wanted to force an order using the STRAIGHT_JOIN statement, but rails doesn''t really let you do it. Having to construct this query manually (there are 4 joins) and still have a right format for eager