search for: hairy

...s ANSI C (1989). So the C++ to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: a) EDG (rather expensive, around USD 100K with source code) b) Comeau (around USD 25K for customization service and you don't get the source code) c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the expression) d) gcc2c (trying now, don't know how useful yet) For more info on the said C to JVM compiler you can check out our website: http://www.axiomsol.com Cheers. Napi

On 12/6/18 3:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This generates small functions which map from various integer NBD > protocol flags to the string equivalent. > > eg: > name_of_nbd_cmd (NBD_CMD_READ) > ---> "NBD_CMD_READ" > > This commit uses some hairy sed scripting to ensure that we don't add > any more dependencies to nbdkit. Hairy, but well-commented. It forces some rather strict formatting to keep things working, but we touch the file seldom enough that I don't think that's a problem. Series looks good to me; I'll proba...

Hi All, Is it possible to use Quintum AFT800 on Asterisk 1.4.29 as Trunk for Analog (like Digium Analog Card) ? And if it's possible, could any one please give me the reference how to configure it on Asterisk 1.4.29. Thanks Regards, Zoel Hairi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...me time. > The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++ > to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: > [...] > c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the > expression) > So you just want to feed the C code to your C-to-JVM compiler? I don't understand why "hairy" code would be a problem for that usage. As a different option, how about writing a JVM backend for LLVM?

I've got a data frame that looks like this: subject foo bar 2 1.7 3.2 2 2.3 4.1 3 7.6 2.3 3 7.1 3.3 3 7.3 2.3 3 7.4 1.3 5 6.2 6.1 5 3.4 6.9 ... That is, I've got multiple rows per subject. I need to compute summaries within categories where the subject has the same number

...is allowed, but ldrsb sp, [r0] is forbidden. I think they should both be UNPREDICTABLE (though this is an understandable error; support for unpredictable is in its early stages). Annoyingly, there is *some* distinction between the writeback and non-writeback versions. Fixing it properly might get hairy rather quickly. Tim.

Hi, I have a question about the definitions of t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE in ARMInstrThumb2.td : I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced?

...g the brackets > emitted in generated code is problematic (line numbers et cetera), so > don't bother in those cases. > > Beside marking the changes we've made, the purpose of APPLE LOCAL > brackets is reduce confusion when we merge with the main branch > (sometimes a very hairy task when there are lots of conflicts.) I think that adding the marks may actually increase the number of spurious conflicts (I had some problem with them while backporting patches from 4.1). Anyway, I have attached a version with the brackets. Is it ok? I believe that it is mostly ARM specific....

At the moment the daemon code contains an incredibly hairy function called shell_quote for safely quoting strings passed to the shell. The patch replaces that with a glibc custom printf format (actually two, but very closely related), %Q and %R. %Q is like %s but it safely shell quotes the string. %R is like %Q but it prefixes the path with /sysroot. E...

Agreed, never emit pushf/popf. Sorry I never committed the patch, the cmov issue got hairy and I never got to debugging it :-) I can get back to it if there's interest! On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I remember this bug. :) IMO, LLVM should never emit pushf / popf. I'm not > sure this patch to fix it ever got committed: &...

This patch exports to userspace the boot loader ID which has been exported by (b)zImage boot loaders since boot protocol version 2. Tested on i386 and x86-64; as far as I know those are the only architectures which use zImage/bzImage format. -hpa Signed-Off-By: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>

...ght of that, too, but it violates the spirit of my restraints (to avoid character strings), which I unfortunately did not clearly articulate. So my apologies for that failure. My concern is that with more complex model formula, using as.formula, etc. to parse/convert character strings can get a bit hairy. But in most cases, as here maybe, it may be perfectly fine. So think of my post as mostly my attempt to learn some new tricks rather than to solve a useful problem. I hope this is not unfair to the list. Cheers, Bert On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 3:12?PM Richard M. Heiberger <rmh at temple.edu&...

...;t really an issue. I rarely had to rebase something manually. > What happens > then? Would things need to pass another build before the "final merge?" > If so, then something needs to keep a list of pending PRs waiting for > "final merge." This quickly gets very hairy as pending PRs have to > constantly be rebased and rebuilt as other PRs land. > Some projects have a flag they set and let some bot do the manual work: Rebase, re-test and then automatically merge. I do not expect this to be perfect, it should rather be much better than today in slipping new...

...about true distribution of those data, like: normal, lognormal, gamma, ex-Gaussian (exponential-Gaussian), Wald (inverse Gaussian) etc. The best way would be via qq-plot, to show to students differences. First two are trivial: qqnorm(dat$X) qqnorm(log(dat$X)) Then, things are getting more "hairy". I am not sure how to make plots for the rest. I tried gamma with: qqmath(~ X, data=dat, distribution=function(X) qgamma(X, shape, scale)) Which should be the same as: plot(qgamma(ppoints(dat$X), shape, scale), sort(dat$X)) Shape and scale parameters I got via mhsmm package that has gamm...

...it. Would it be a >> good idea to add the information above somewhere in the wiki, in case >> others will face the same issue at some point? > > You are probably correct, but where to put it ??? The following man page is the one I read several times when things started to get hairy and I narrowed things down to issues with vfs recycle - and where I was looking for some enlightening notes on the subject: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_recycle.8.html Something along the lines of: "vfs objects = recycle Please note that the config line above wil...

The changes to vorbisfile that I suggested earlier have now been committed - this is mostly a merge of my code with a similar patch from Martin Vogt (thanks Martin). The old ov_open() interface remains untouched - and for many people, this is all you'll need to use, ever. It now calls the new interface with appropriate arguments. The new ov_open_callbacks() function adds an extra argument to

On 7/29/15 18:35, JF Bastien wrote: > Agreed, never emit pushf/popf. Sorry I never committed the patch, the > cmov issue got hairy and I never got to debugging it :-) > I can get back to it if there's interest! You've definitely got some interest here. I've been looking at your patch on http://reviews.llvm.org/D6629 and I think I'm up to speed on where it's stuck. I'll shoot you an email directl...

...reason for writing LLVM assembler and not > generating LLVM code directly? You mean write C++ code that calls the LLVM library ? I have a mild C++ allergy that I don't wish to aggravate. > The later is simpler and relieves you > from some nasty burdens. Yes, i'm finding it quite hairy! :) Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 02 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com

...rpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the > > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++ > > to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: > > [...] > > c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the > > expression) > > > So you just want to feed the C code to your C-to-JVM compiler? I don't > understand why "hairy" code would be a problem for that usage. > > As a different option, how about writing a JVM backend for LLVM? This is definitel...

So, I investigated this a while ago... does anybody have good experience/good instructions as to how to move your rails app to using a push server? Which ones are best? Most Stable? Easiest to implement and use? Our site is currently doing some regular polling, and it''s getting hairy fast. I looked into using Juggernaut a while ago, but I''m not certain it''s going to be good for production going forward, it''s also flash based. I see a quick article on a true "push" server using http here: http://www.wayne-robinson.com/journal/2006/5/5/effic...