search for: hairy

...s ANSI C (1989). So the C++ to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: a) EDG (rather expensive, around USD 100K with source code) b) Comeau (around USD 25K for customization service and you don't get the source code) c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the expression) d) gcc2c (trying now, don't know how useful yet) For more info on the said C to JVM compiler you can check out our website: http://www.axiomsol.com Cheers. Napi

On 12/6/18 3:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This generates small functions which map from various integer NBD > protocol flags to the string equivalent. > > eg: > name_of_nbd_cmd (NBD_CMD_READ) > ---> "NBD_CMD_READ" > > This commit uses some hairy sed scripting to ensure that we don't add > any more dependencies to nbdkit. Hairy, but well-commented. It forces some rather strict formatting to keep things working, but we touch the file seldom enough that I don't think that's a problem. Series looks good to me; I'll proba...

Hi All, Is it possible to use Quintum AFT800 on Asterisk 1.4.29 as Trunk for Analog (like Digium Analog Card) ? And if it's possible, could any one please give me the reference how to configure it on Asterisk 1.4.29. Thanks Regards, Zoel Hairi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...me time. > The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++ > to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: > [...] > c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the > expression) > So you just want to feed the C code to your C-to-JVM compiler? I don't understand why "hairy" code would be a problem for that usage. As a different option, how about writing a JVM backend for LLVM?

I've got a data frame that looks like this: subject foo bar 2 1.7 3.2 2 2.3 4.1 3 7.6 2.3 3 7.1 3.3 3 7.3 2.3 3 7.4 1.3 5 6.2 6.1 5 3.4 6.9 ... That is, I've got multiple rows per subject. I need to compute summaries within categories where the subject has the same number

...is allowed, but ldrsb sp, [r0] is forbidden. I think they should both be UNPREDICTABLE (though this is an understandable error; support for unpredictable is in its early stages). Annoyingly, there is *some* distinction between the writeback and non-writeback versions. Fixing it properly might get hairy rather quickly. Tim.

Hi, I have a question about the definitions of t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE in ARMInstrThumb2.td : I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced?

...g the brackets > emitted in generated code is problematic (line numbers et cetera), so > don't bother in those cases. > > Beside marking the changes we've made, the purpose of APPLE LOCAL > brackets is reduce confusion when we merge with the main branch > (sometimes a very hairy task when there are lots of conflicts.) I think that adding the marks may actually increase the number of spurious conflicts (I had some problem with them while backporting patches from 4.1). Anyway, I have attached a version with the brackets. Is it ok? I believe that it is mostly ARM specific....

At the moment the daemon code contains an incredibly hairy function called shell_quote for safely quoting strings passed to the shell. The patch replaces that with a glibc custom printf format (actually two, but very closely related), %Q and %R. %Q is like %s but it safely shell quotes the string. %R is like %Q but it prefixes the path with /sysroot. E...

Agreed, never emit pushf/popf. Sorry I never committed the patch, the cmov issue got hairy and I never got to debugging it :-) I can get back to it if there's interest! On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I remember this bug. :) IMO, LLVM should never emit pushf / popf. I'm not > sure this patch to fix it ever got committed: &...

This patch exports to userspace the boot loader ID which has been exported by (b)zImage boot loaders since boot protocol version 2. Tested on i386 and x86-64; as far as I know those are the only architectures which use zImage/bzImage format. -hpa Signed-Off-By: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>

...;t really an issue. I rarely had to rebase something manually. > What happens > then? Would things need to pass another build before the "final merge?" > If so, then something needs to keep a list of pending PRs waiting for > "final merge." This quickly gets very hairy as pending PRs have to > constantly be rebased and rebuilt as other PRs land. > Some projects have a flag they set and let some bot do the manual work: Rebase, re-test and then automatically merge. I do not expect this to be perfect, it should rather be much better than today in slipping new...

...about true distribution of those data, like: normal, lognormal, gamma, ex-Gaussian (exponential-Gaussian), Wald (inverse Gaussian) etc. The best way would be via qq-plot, to show to students differences. First two are trivial: qqnorm(dat$X) qqnorm(log(dat$X)) Then, things are getting more "hairy". I am not sure how to make plots for the rest. I tried gamma with: qqmath(~ X, data=dat, distribution=function(X) qgamma(X, shape, scale)) Which should be the same as: plot(qgamma(ppoints(dat$X), shape, scale), sort(dat$X)) Shape and scale parameters I got via mhsmm package that has gamm...

...it. Would it be a >> good idea to add the information above somewhere in the wiki, in case >> others will face the same issue at some point? > > You are probably correct, but where to put it ??? The following man page is the one I read several times when things started to get hairy and I narrowed things down to issues with vfs recycle - and where I was looking for some enlightening notes on the subject: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_recycle.8.html Something along the lines of: "vfs objects = recycle Please note that the config line above wil...

The changes to vorbisfile that I suggested earlier have now been committed - this is mostly a merge of my code with a similar patch from Martin Vogt (thanks Martin). The old ov_open() interface remains untouched - and for many people, this is all you'll need to use, ever. It now calls the new interface with appropriate arguments. The new ov_open_callbacks() function adds an extra argument to

On 7/29/15 18:35, JF Bastien wrote: > Agreed, never emit pushf/popf. Sorry I never committed the patch, the > cmov issue got hairy and I never got to debugging it :-) > I can get back to it if there's interest! You've definitely got some interest here. I've been looking at your patch on http://reviews.llvm.org/D6629 and I think I'm up to speed on where it's stuck. I'll shoot you an email directl...

...reason for writing LLVM assembler and not > generating LLVM code directly? You mean write C++ code that calls the LLVM library ? I have a mild C++ allergy that I don't wish to aggravate. > The later is simpler and relieves you > from some nasty burdens. Yes, i'm finding it quite hairy! :) Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 02 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com

...rpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the > > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++ > > to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: > > [...] > > c) LLVM (tried, but the resulting C code is quite hairy, pardon the > > expression) > > > So you just want to feed the C code to your C-to-JVM compiler? I don't > understand why "hairy" code would be a problem for that usage. > > As a different option, how about writing a JVM backend for LLVM? This is definitel...

So, I investigated this a while ago... does anybody have good experience/good instructions as to how to move your rails app to using a push server? Which ones are best? Most Stable? Easiest to implement and use? Our site is currently doing some regular polling, and it''s getting hairy fast. I looked into using Juggernaut a while ago, but I''m not certain it''s going to be good for production going forward, it''s also flash based. I see a quick article on a true "push" server using http here: http://www.wayne-robinson.com/journal/2006/5/5/effic...

...en find bug #217--so I might have missed something.) Google doesn't seem to turn up anything, either. Does -cee actually produce incorrect code for some inputs? Or is it merely incomplete? I'm looking for an optimizer pass to tweak (as a learning exercise), and if -cee isn't too hairy, I'd be happy to add support for 'switch' instructions and fix a few minor bugs. :-) Cheers, Eric