search for: hairpins

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

Hello: Has anyone on this list had to configure hairpinning on a Cisco gateway running IOS 12.2 or 12.3 and using a PRI for connectivity to the PSTN? If so could you tell me how it is done? I'm told this is the source of my call transfer problems and yet I cannot find clear instructions for how the configuration is done. Thanks,Steve -- ISC Network Engineering The University of

Hi: Currently we encounter a problem where OpenStack may forget or misconfig the bridge hairpin setting, and will cause some unexpected behavior [1]. Although this bug is marked fixed, but if we manually restart the vm by virsh will also trigger the problem. And because the bridge interface is created and managed by libvirt, we are considering move the hairpin configuration to libvirt.

Asterisk 1.2.7 RedHat 9.0 I frequently have the need to redirect calls that come in on a DiD provisioned by my ITSP, back to the ITSP so that they can terminate the call on the PSTN. For example when an external call comes in, I often have to send it to a cell phone. I believe that this is referred to as "hairpinning" the call. I do this by answering the incoming call and then I use

Hello List Asterisk 13.14.1 in use with pjsip stack. On the remote side is a SBC which performs some 'nat' detection. I suppose this means the SBC listens from where it is getting RTP data and then replies to that ip. As long as the asterisk is initiating the call this is fine, the asterisk start sending RTP to the media IP of the SBC and the SBC is sending media back. Now I want to do

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux Ethernet bridging utilities. The patch provides functionality that depends on the Linux kernel patch 'net/bridge: add basic VEPA support'. This patch relies on the patch 'bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters'. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux Ethernet bridging utilities. The patch provides functionality that depends on the Linux kernel patch 'net/bridge: add basic VEPA support'. This patch relies on the patch 'bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters'. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux Ethernet bridging utilities. The patch provides functionality that depends on the Linux kernel patch 'net/bridge: add basic VEPA support'. This patch relies on the patch 'bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters'. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is

Hi Joshua > The "rtp_keepalive" option can be used to have the RTP stack send an > RTP packet out. Try that and see what happens. Once again 'bullseye' that fixed the problem. Thank you! Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen -Beno?t Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29

This is based on an earlier patch from Eric Biederman adding forwarding between macvlans. I extended his approach to allow the administrator to choose the mode for each macvlan, and to implement a functional VEPA between macvlan. Still missing from this is support for communication between the lower device that the macvlans are based on. This would be extremely useful but as others have found out

This is based on an earlier patch from Eric Biederman adding forwarding between macvlans. I extended his approach to allow the administrator to choose the mode for each macvlan, and to implement a functional VEPA between macvlan. Still missing from this is support for communication between the lower device that the macvlans are based on. This would be extremely useful but as others have found out

This is based on an earlier patch from Eric Biederman adding forwarding between macvlans. I extended his approach to allow the administrator to choose the mode for each macvlan, and to implement a functional VEPA between macvlan. Still missing from this is support for communication between the lower device that the macvlans are based on. This would be extremely useful but as others have found out

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster