search for: hairi

On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 22:45 -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > On May 8, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote: > >> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: > >>> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c > >>> developed > >>> by SUN

On 12/6/18 3:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This generates small functions which map from various integer NBD > protocol flags to the string equivalent. > > eg: > name_of_nbd_cmd (NBD_CMD_READ) > ---> "NBD_CMD_READ" > > This commit uses some hairy sed scripting to ensure that we don't add > any more dependencies to nbdkit. Hairy, but

Hi All, Is it possible to use Quintum AFT800 on Asterisk 1.4.29 as Trunk for Analog (like Digium Analog Card) ? And if it's possible, could any one please give me the reference how to configure it on Asterisk 1.4.29. Thanks Regards, Zoel Hairi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20101122/a6d56d6a/attachment.htm

On 11/05/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: > I've been looking for a C++ to C translator for quite some time. > The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++ > to C translator is needed, and among the options are as follows: > [...] > c) LLVM

I've got a data frame that looks like this: subject foo bar 2 1.7 3.2 2 2.3 4.1 3 7.6 2.3 3 7.1 3.3 3 7.3 2.3 3 7.4 1.3 5 6.2 6.1 5 3.4 6.9 ... That is, I've got multiple rows per subject. I need to compute summaries within categories where the subject has the same number

Hi Junbum, > I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced? They're not allocated during CodeGen because of the Reserved.set(…) calls in

Hi, I have a question about the definitions of t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE in ARMInstrThumb2.td : I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced?

On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey <jlaskey at apple.com> wrote: > Rafael, > > Please bracket portions of your changes that involve modification of > C/C++ source code. For cases of modifying configuration scripts and > make files, use your best judgement. Obviously having the brackets > emitted in generated code is problematic (line numbers et cetera), so > don't bother in

At the moment the daemon code contains an incredibly hairy function called shell_quote for safely quoting strings passed to the shell. The patch replaces that with a glibc custom printf format (actually two, but very closely related), %Q and %R. %Q is like %s but it safely shell quotes the string. %R is like %Q but it prefixes the path with /sysroot. Example usage (w/o error checks):

Agreed, never emit pushf/popf. Sorry I never committed the patch, the cmov issue got hairy and I never got to debugging it :-) I can get back to it if there's interest! On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I remember this bug. :) IMO, LLVM should never emit pushf / popf. I'm not > sure this patch to fix it ever got committed: >

This patch exports to userspace the boot loader ID which has been exported by (b)zImage boot loaders since boot protocol version 2. Tested on i386 and x86-64; as far as I know those are the only architectures which use zImage/bzImage format. -hpa Signed-Off-By: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:24 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Christian Kühnel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > >>> In Github pull requests there is always a git commit that you can just > >>> feed to the build server. And you can be sure of what really gets > merged. > >>> You review, build and test

Hello! I am trying with this question again: I would like to test few distributional assumptions for some behavioral response data. There are few theories about true distribution of those data, like: normal, lognormal, gamma, ex-Gaussian (exponential-Gaussian), Wald (inverse Gaussian) etc. The best way would be via qq-plot, to show to students differences. First two are trivial: qqnorm(dat$X)

On 02/12/19 16:53, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/12/2019 16:24, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> </snip> > >>> You should have 'vfs objects = dfs_samba4 acl_xattr recycle' >> >> Thank you very much for this - now it is working. This lack of >> permissions inheritance issue has been plaguing me for months - it is >> very

The changes to vorbisfile that I suggested earlier have now been committed - this is mostly a merge of my code with a similar patch from Martin Vogt (thanks Martin). The old ov_open() interface remains untouched - and for many people, this is all you'll need to use, ever. It now calls the new interface with appropriate arguments. The new ov_open_callbacks() function adds an extra argument to

On 7/29/15 18:35, JF Bastien wrote: > Agreed, never emit pushf/popf. Sorry I never committed the patch, the > cmov issue got hairy and I never got to debugging it :-) > I can get back to it if there's interest! You've definitely got some interest here. I've been looking at your patch on http://reviews.llvm.org/D6629 and I think I'm up to speed on where it's stuck.

On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:47:00 +0200 Oscar Fuentes <oscarfv at telefonica.net> wrote: > > BTW, Simon, is there a reason for writing LLVM assembler and not > generating LLVM code directly? You mean write C++ code that calls the LLVM library ? I have a mild C++ allergy that I don't wish to aggravate. > The later is simpler and relieves you > from some nasty burdens. Yes,

On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 23:15 -0400, me22 wrote: > On 11/05/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: > > I've been looking for a C++ to C translator for quite some time. > > The purpose is to support C++ for the compiler I developed targeting the > > JVM. But the compiler I wrote only supports ANSI C (1989). So the C++ > > to C translator is

So, I investigated this a while ago... does anybody have good experience/good instructions as to how to move your rails app to using a push server? Which ones are best? Most Stable? Easiest to implement and use? Our site is currently doing some regular polling, and it''s getting hairy fast. I looked into using Juggernaut a while ago, but I''m not certain it''s going to

On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Great. Note that -cee is a beta pass... it has some known bugs and > isn't planned to be worked on in the immediate future. :( After a bit of digging, I found one open bug and two failing test cases, all of which appear to be feature requests: #217: LLVM needs a generic dominator update mechanism nullpointer.ll: "a