search for: hairdo

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > My advise is to check in when you have to make forward progress. If > people want to reshave your yak into another hairdo, then then can do that > at some later time. No reason to block your progress as long as the API is > good. I was trying to give feedback on the API, and specifically suggest an alternative that might be both easier to use, and naturally dovetail with an upcoming standard. =/ Is there no i...

...nstants.cpp to use it though (just so that any problems doesn't cause both to get reverted). > > OK. I'm still working on getting a consensus from the hashing experts :) My advise is to check in when you have to make forward progress. If people want to reshave your yak into another hairdo, then then can do that at some later time. No reason to block your progress as long as the API is good. Thanks again for working on this! -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120218/f8ad...

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 17, 2012, at 12:26 AM, Talin wrote: > > OK here's a patch with the latest, including unit tests. I've also tried > to make the comments clear that this is intended for the case of "generic" > key types, where you are either hashing multiple data types together, or > you

A month or two ago I sent an email to this list proposing to expand the list of "standard" tags for Ogg Vorbis. No tag would be required, but if you wanted to encode certain types of information about a file, you could use a standard tag. I went through the whole discussion, and revised my proposal in light of all the comments from everyone. Here is the updated proposal. This