search for: haezel

...ue include: > > 1) Re: NT Logon Authentication > by Gerald Carter <cartegw@Eng.Auburn.EDU> > 2) Samba-> No [.] and [..] directories > by Kai Schaeffer <kschaeffer@schaeffer-apparatebau.de> > 3) Permissions > by ping0621@ping.be (Bart Haezeleer) > 4) Q : Disallow samba over 1 NIC > by ping0621@ping.be (Bart Haezeleer) > 5) RE: Three problems with Windows NT > by "Jeremy Malcolm" <Jeremy@Malcolm.ml.org> > 6) Re: Q : Disallow samba over 1 NIC > by "Robert Dahlem" &...

Hi, While trying to install a DNS I found that the PC locks on boot. I started the deamons of samba in /etc/rc.d/rc.local I tried to configure the DNS as follow: /etc/host.conf order bind, hosts multi on nospoof on /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.2.1 linux.home.be linux /etc/networks 1oopback 27.0.0.0 localnet 192.168.2.0 /etc/resolv.conf domain home.be # DNS

Currently I'm using a linux+samba+PPP I didn't had to do something special to disallow samba over the PPP connection. Must I do something to disallow samba over a second NIC (=not the LAN) or how must samba be bound to the nic of the LAN ?

A collegue claim there is a way to setup a SUS server on a linux/unix, but he doesn't have any URLs or documentation. Is there a solution such a solution (pure unix, no emulation with vmware or so)? Where can I find more info? THX

Recently I discovered some strange entries in my logfiles. Theses entries appears in /var/log/messages and /var/log/samba/log.nmbd ... Nov 2 17:27:32 pc00 nmbd[1093]: [2003/11/02 17:27:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(183) process_name_refresh_request: unicast name registration request received for name MYDOMAIN<00> from IP IP_CLIENT on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET.

Hi Group, I set up samba3.0 to work as ADS-Member-Server. I created a share called /test and chown group to gg_test to it. Access to share works without any problems. I also can add files and directories to this share. When I now make ln -l, the files I added got the group-permissions "Domain Users" and not gg_test, as I expected. Do someone know a solution? Thanks in advance.

Currently I'm running Samba 1.9.18p3 on a production server. Smbstatus gives wrong information about locked files. For a client, still connected but closed the program, smbstatus still displays the locked files. Is there a solution or parameter I missed ? I think I read it somewhere in a digest but can't find it anymore. Can anyone direct me to the digest or know the problem ? I didn't