search for: haberland

On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;( > > It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again. I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC checking without using exceptions for the lists they are on. It's a known fact that DMARC does not

...n of three different 'tar -xzf' once, but the next time I tried it, one of the tar processes segfaulted and I got the attached Oops. The machine is running a plain RedHat 6.2 with updates and the e2fsprogs and quota-tools you provided with your ext-0.0.3b patch. Greetings, Juri -- juri.haberland@innominate.com system engineer innominate AG clustering & security the linux architects tel: +49-30-308806-45 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com

So there is no way to skip Postfix for incoming messages and go directly to LMTP/LDA but I need two instances of Postfix in that case? Regarding your second question - it is required to be complaint with Direct Trust. Thanks, Adam ?On 4/2/20, 3:07 PM, "dovecot on behalf of Juri Haberland" <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org on behalf of juri at koschikode.com> wrote: On 02/04/2020 15:18, Adam Raszkiewicz wrote: > Desired flow looks like: > > Dovecot ---------------------> Postfix --> Relay Server -? > Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Pos...

Hi, I am not totally sure what caused this but I just wanted to know if anything of this sort has been seen in the ext3 world. I did a fresh install of redhat 7.2 linux with kernel-2.4.9(we have some patches applied to this). I have root and boot filesystems as ext3 type. After running some tests the system gets into a strange state. I cannot move one file to another if that destination file

On 15/03/2020 21:26, GMX Account wrote: > have a look at this: > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter > > [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters > (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is > separated from its extension by the first character that matches the > recipient_delimiter [1] set.[...]

Greetings. Total newbie with Ext3. I selected when I upgraded my system to RH7.2. I upgraded my system again to RH8.0. Here is some info: [root@world root]# cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 /dev/hdd1 /mnt/genericdata1 ext2 rw 0 0 Ok, so

I thought I'd summarise this with a proper subject line: 1. We used up2date to upgrade the kernel of a 7.2 machine that is doing far too much journalling (kjournald at 50% CPU+ often). 2. It installed fine, but when we reboot - GRUB only shows the old 2.4.7-10 although there are 3 kernels listed in grub.conf My Question is "How can we select booting to 2.4.18-24.7 when GRUB lonly lists

On 12/03/2020 08:04, Jean-Daniel wrote: > > >> Le 11 mars 2020 ? 19:32, Juri Haberland <juri at koschikode.com> a ?crit : >> >> Hi list, >> >> I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. >> Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both >> Postfix and Dovecot (using lmt...

I have a Debian system from a Knoppix distribution. I started out with ext2 but decided to change to ext3. tune2fs -j OK. However the system boots with a warning ....ext3 mounted as ext2. proc/mounts confirms this and no journal is running. So I have to make an initrd. Did so using instructions in the Debian Reference and this did not change anything. Any attempt to use the img produced was a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Well for other mailing lists I have noticed that a lot of lists add text to the body or subject saying what list the email is from which would cause the signature not to match. But the dovecot list doesn't do that so that's why I found it strange that so many emails fail dkim. - -- Steven Mainor On February 7, 2017 2:22:59 AM EST,

On 2/9/19 10:48 AM, Juri Haberland via dovecot wrote: > On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;( >> >> It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again. > > I'd say, let Mailman throw all p...

* Juri Haberland via dovecot: > Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences > for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving > participants. Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also, the issue was not on the receiving end, b...

> Le 11 mars 2020 ? 19:32, Juri Haberland <juri at koschikode.com> a ?crit : > > Hi list, > > I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. > Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both > Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that...

On 16/03/20 7:10 am, Juri Haberland wrote: > My question would be: > Is this due to a misconfiguration somewhere? > Is this the intended behavior? > Or is this a bug? Poorly documented, imo, but you want lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes: https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/doc/example-config/conf.d/20-lmtp.conf...

On 15/03/2020 20:26, Peter wrote: > Poorly documented, imo, but you want lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes: Thanks, tried it, but no, that's not what I want and it doesn't help in my case. To recap: If I set recipient_delimiter to "+-" (or "-" alone), having a user named "foo-bar" won't work anymore, because Dovecot always tries to deliver to user

...limiter [1] set contains multiple characters (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is separated from its extension by the first character that matches the recipient_delimiter [1] set.[...] --- Original Nachricht --- Betreff:?Re: lmtp and recipient_delimiter Von:?"Juri Haberland" An:?dovecot at dovecot.org Datum:?15-03-2020 20:56 On 15/03/2020 20:26, Peter wrote: > Poorly documented, imo, but you want lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes: Thanks, tried it, but no, that's not what I want and it doesn't help in my case. To recap: If I set recipient_delim...

On Sonntag, 15. M?rz 2020 21:43:08 CET Juri Haberland wrote: > On 15/03/2020 21:26, GMX Account wrote: > > have a look at this: > > > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter > > > > [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters > > (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user n...

...div> On 15/03/2020 21:26 Peter < <a href="mailto:peter@pajamian.dhs.org">peter@pajamian.dhs.org</a>> wrote: </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> On 16/03/20 7:10 am, Juri Haberland wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> My question would be: </div> <div> Is this due to a misconfiguration somewhere? </div> <div> Is this the intended behavior? </div> <div>...

Hi list, I recently came up with the need for the storage, shared between two nodes; one would do all the r/w to it and the other would mount it r/o and serve it to the client boxen. I want to use ext3 in this setup, since i trust it the most. My question is: is this possible? How would the r/o node handle the metadata updates that the r/w node would be doing? If there is some fundamental

Hi, this site: http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ says "Forbidden" when I try to access .... , where can I download the ext3 patch for 2.4.15 ? Thank you Nikolai