Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "h4vjvjvtdr1cwq".
2015 Nov 13
1
Differences from upstream RHEL
...Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWRaJDAAoJEAUijw0EjkDv5MQIAJFAA3D9HEa0VMLaXczLbsp2
K+5IJ9SkLmC6ePVod83mxkq2EZha19qmVaD0hHJIeEVo8IXiuR5UYdehVByDj8Jy
7SULhxG8O6+tv39S22iSHk2Q4JTWEL5lbhwi9QI8MZ6ndfjj3OJkXWXWGW9QuluS
hKBQzRQvvNeJ0XFnJ2ZZjhOXV5mU5MBJk3Zzu2NuMxMAqZ+H4vJVJVtDr1cwq/7s
FO5e0I2gDZ9QlTFg6ZOMxm+aqNVW/RCV98s3W4C47JEBKB8J7nTi266qQeCR1yH4
VIO6isDWUjsgIBuRtGJRysdAh0XqNqY8WL7SS5TPYh8j7rk+QmiajVfLGzid3A0=
=fCrU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2015 Nov 11
2
Differences from upstream RHEL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/15 15:17, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Devin Reade
>>
>> The above answer is right-on. From a technical perspective, you
>> can probably expect the 3rd party software to work exactly the
>> same on RHEL and