search for: gyrations

I want to convert the last of my filesystems to ext3. The only one left is /boot. It is not very big however, only about 10MB itself. Any recommendations on what size journal to put a /boot filesystem of only 10-20MB? Oh, BTW: "tunefs -j -J size=..." is awesome. No more gyrations with dd, chattr, lilo -R, etc. Nice! One note however: even in Stephen's 1.20.WIP.sct-20010216 release, it is an error to use -j without -J ... I seem to recall that -j without -J size is supposed to estimate a journal size and create it. b.

So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs simply disabling systemd.resolved Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS server? [I'm not complaining, I'm thankful for all the options - just wanting to have the best handle possible on the reasoning behind one method vs the other.] Thanks Louis! -Greg LPHvBvs> Hai,...

...L/usr/local/lib -lrt -ldl -lpthread -lz and indeed libLLVMSupport is there $ ls /usr/local/lib/libLLVMSupport* /usr/local/lib/libLLVMSupport.a > ld: fatal: file processing errors. No output written to TargetInfo > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > All other gyrations are attempts to shoehorn LLVMSupport into the compile. I've > been sourcing the Makefile and README for hints. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130726/f8a69b57/attachment.html>

RPvs> On Fri, 11 May 2018 07:14:38 -0700 RPvs> Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs >> simply disabling systemd.resolved >> Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs >> simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS >> server? [I'm not complaining, I'm thankful for all the options - just >> wanting to have the best handle possible on the reasoning behind one >> method vs the other.] RPvs...

I first tried the regular install for Linux Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex. Both the Wine user interface and e-Sword were there but completely blank, i.e. no labelling. uninstalled wine Uninstalled e-Sword installed binaries and command line apt libraries Wine User interface is there but still minus labels and functionality What do I do now?

I have a series of data frames that are identical structurally, i.e. - made with the same code, but I need to add them together so that they become one, longer, data frame, i.e. - each of the slot vectors are increased in length by the length of the added data frame vectors. So if I have df1 with a slot A so that length(df1$A) = 100 and I have df2 with a slot A so that length(df2$A)=200 then I

...'re running into is this: $ GCC=/usr/bin/gcc LLVM_CONFIG=/usr/bin/llvm-config make Compiling utils/TargetInfo.cpp Linking TargetInfo ld: fatal: library -lLLVMSupport: not found ld: fatal: file processing errors. No output written to TargetInfo collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit statusAll other gyrations are attempts to shoehorn LLVMSupport into the compile. I've been sourcing the Makefile and README for hints. To your point on declaring the location of gcc: Oddly, though gcc (4.7) is available to the environment, the Makefile does not find it without explicit direction: dragonegg-3.3.src$ mak...

...There are no .Renviron files on the system and the only .Rprofiles are the [#'d out] one in /etc and the original, unmodified "mother-of-all-Rprofiles" in /lib/R. The latter, for some reason, loads ctest... I'm obviously missing something since I didn't go thru any such gyrations using R<1.2.1 ? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-...

...tailored for a Unix derivative platform and depends on the functionality of the UNIXSocket class to pass file descriptors between instances. It works in a master-slave type of server setup. The "master" is the initial instance of mongrel rails which goes through its normal initialization gyrations before forking mulitple "slave" instances to do the actual rails processing. The server listens on the defined TCP/IP address and port accepting request (from Apache in our case), determines which child if any is available, and then hands off the file descriptor for processing. The numbe...

...); sa.sa_flags = SA_ONSTACK | SA_NODEFER; sa.sa_handler = (void *) v; // Use this function. The stub_segv_handler function is defined with: void __attribute__ ((__section__ (".__syscall_stub"))) stub_segv_handler(int sig) {...} I don't actually quite understand the reason all these gyrations are necessary and why it can't just use the signal handler function directly--since it should have been cloned too--but I presume there is a reason or it wouldn't be done this way. Is there a clean way to deal with this problem in LLVM? Again, using LD itself is straightforward because a...

...lly get it to connect ( as evidenced by the iwlist command showing the WAP ID). Eventually the connection between the card and the AP simply dies. I'm not new to wireless and have had no problems manually configuring other wireless cards to work properly, so I have gone through most of the gyrations. Right now I've fallen back to an Orinoco silver. Google doesn't seem to be helpful in this endeavor (lots of hits but most having to do with the 2.4 kernel series) so my question is relatively simple: Before I waste an inordinate amonut of time trying to make this thing work I would...

Nomadica Brainstorming has a summer intern position for its Barcelona, Spain offices. Not far from dozens of wineries and "cavaries". We have a high tech product in the works for the wine industry and want a creative business person to help us work out all the gyrations of this new business model. This might lead to a full time position in Spain or in the US where we have bases. I hope posting an internship position here is not considered Spam...it is a good opportunity for someone for an exciting summer job. We can be reached at jobs at nomadica.co Martin P...

Hello all, I have a samba 2.2.1a server running as the PDC of my network on a Mandrake 8.0 system with a reiserFS partition. I am serving for the win98 clients a small DOS clipper program with a DBF database. The programs run well on the workstations when there is only one user using it, when another user try to use the same program it starts to get very slow. I think this is a lock

...ssue the delete command with the SID as the key. At this point, the user could map their share and all were happy. Question(s): Why would Samba (2.2.5) not allow an all lower case name? Why is there not a method for doing the remove/refresh from the idmap.tdb file? As opposed to the gyrations I had to go through. TIA Sam

Hi, is it possible to make rules or routes with negated ip addresses like that: ip rule add from ! 192.168.0.0/16 table xyz ? Or is this planned for the future? Thanks Regards Lars Täuber _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I am trying to create an input form where subsets of the input data goes into separate rows of the table (events). I have created a proxy object (CompoundEvent) to hold all of the data, and overridden its "save" method to create the several tuples. This was almost working late last night when I did something that stopped the params[] hash from getting any information from the post

...ntu 18.04 Howto setup ADDC with bind9_DLZ (extra part 4.8.1 samba) Sorry to bother you more, Louis... Can you take a quick whack at this? --- > So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs > simply disabling systemd.resolved > > Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs > simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS > server? --- I'd honestly prefer disabling systemd.resolved - but would like to understand your way of doing it better, so I can make an informed choice. Thanks [and sorry all for the thread drift...

Hi, please see the inline comments. On 02/21/2015 08:21 PM, Dean Sauer wrote: > I have a VPS on OpenVZ 2GB RAM / 2GB Burst, and Ubuntu 12.04 64b server > > I use Icecast 2.3.2 <snip /> > > As posted in previous threads I am seeing a situation reoccur where the > sources and clients ALL GET DUMPED...ALL AT ONCE. We'd need error logs from such an incident, perferably

...mba) > > On Fri, 11 May 2018 07:14:38 -0700 > Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs > > simply disabling systemd.resolved > > > > Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs > > simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS > > server? [I'm not complaining, I'm thankful for all the > options - just > > wanting to have the best handle possible on the reasoning behind one > > method vs the othe...

Hello people, I am having difficulties figuring out the POE power draw in watts from a Polycom IP601. I want to know how many IP601's can be powered from the Cisco Catalyst 3560G-48PS. The IP601 wallwart has: Input 120VAC 60hz 19W, Output 24VDC 500mA. I assume the output is appropriate value to figure out how many phones can be powered. The Cisco 3560 datasheet says "the 48-port PoE