Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "gxpelinux".
Did you mean:
gpxelinux
2013 Aug 17
3
Which version shall i choose ?
...for testing.
>
> For a first run at this time, I'd consider gpxelinux.0 from 4.07 or
> perhaps 5.01/5.02-pre3/5.11-pre9 and keep an eye on bug #19 (
> http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19 ) for possibly
> switching to lpxelinux.0.
Yes, makes sense.
I think I will use gxpelinux.0 from 4.07 or 4.05 for "quick and dirty"
boot and have the 5.1x with gpxelinux.0 or lpxelinux.0 in the lab and
testing phase.
bye
Christoph
>
2013 Aug 17
0
Which version shall i choose ?
Christoph Hanle schreef op 17-8-2013 18:08:
> I think I will use gxpelinux.0 from 4.07 or 4.05 for "quick and dirty"
> boot and have the 5.1x with gpxelinux.0 or lpxelinux.0 in the lab and
> testing phase.
Wouldn't iPXE be an option? It might have a couple of menu options
nowadays, like Syslinux always has had.
http://ipxe.org/wimboot
Bernd
2013 Aug 17
2
Which version shall i choose ?
Hi all,
I need some suggestions or hints which syslinux version I shall use.
The main focus will be on PXE boot.
I have to upgrade due to (expected) performance problems (tftp), so I
will swich to HTTP boot !
existing system:
- syslinux version 4.05 (tftp only)
- used modules : pxelinux.0, memdisk, vesamenuc32, patched startrom.0
- I boot .nbi , .iso, .ima and sometimes files (clonezilla etc.)
-