Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "gwillingham".
Did you mean:
willingham
2005 Jun 15
0
RE: Call being answered, but no audio on either end
Thanks Gene.
Here is my localnet:
localnet=172.16.64.0/255.255.240.0
Which matches our subnets network address and subnet mask. Are you
recommending that I make it more restrictive?
Thanks,
Geoff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Willingham [mailto:gwillingham@comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:13 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Cc: gmanning@zoom.com
> Subject: RE: Call being answered, but no audio on either end
>
>
>
> I think I found the source of this. Been tracing it for a
> week. Look in
> s...
2004 Dec 23
1
RE: IAX2 calls failing one way
I received this before, and it is because you are using the wrong context in
the iax.conf.
For example:
The context must match the username in the register statement.
Iax.conf...
register => username:secret@iax.host.net
[username]
type=friend
context=iax-in
user=username
secret=secret
auth=plaintext
host=iax.hust.net
----------------------------------------------------------------
2004 Oct 07
1
Call Parking with multiple contexts
Everyone,
I am trying to set up a hosted PBX. I want to set up call parking with in
each context. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Gene
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041007/1da29250/attachment.htm
2005 Mar 08
1
Asterisk Interop w/ Level 3
Has anyone done interop testing with Level 3 and Asterisk. If so, would you
be willing to share your experiences.
Gene
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050308/061aea35/attachment.htm
2005 Jun 14
0
RE: Call being answered, but no audio on either end
I think I found the source of this. Been tracing it for a week. Look in
sip.conf. It appears the definition of localnet has a bearing on how some
sip devices handle invites and NAT.
I had changed the localnet to 192.168.3.0, but did not change the netmask.
localnet=192.168.3.0/255.255.0.0; All RFC 1918 addresses are local networks
When I changed the netmask to 255.255.255.0 the problem