search for: gval

...3.72, 0.8, 0.94, 0.66, 0.48, 6.94, 3.19, 0.84, 1.27, 1.85, 5.23, 0.75, 0.55, 4.69, 8.51, 3.98, 0.65, 4.72, 0.94, 0.86, 6.27, 3.42, 1.03, 1.83, 0.86, 8.59, 0.72, 7.92, 0.84, 0.49, 0.78, 7.31, 5.15, 0.88, 0.57, 0.95, 0.69, 8.77, 0.86, 0.82, 2.02, 6.99, 5.01, 0.84, 1.09, 1.02, 0.66, 9.23, 0.74, 2.21), gval = c(1, 3, 4, 4, 1, 5, 5, 4, 6, 4, 2, 6, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 5, 1, 5, 1, 5, 6, 6, 6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 5, 1, 5, 4, 5, 6, 3, 4, 3, 6, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 4, 6, 6, 6, 5, 2, 1, 4, 5, 5, 4, 1, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2, 6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 1, 3, 2, 1, 3, 6, 5, 2, 6, 4, 2, 2, 1, 1, 5, 2, 6, 6, 3, 1, 4...

Hi, Is there a way to plot more than one trend surface using the functions contourplot() and wireframe(). I have found an add=T in contour(), but no equivalent argument in contourplot() and wireframe()? I have taken the example 11-2 (pages 441-451) from Design and analysis of experiments (Montgomery 2001, 5th edition) to see if this could be done in R. I have managed to plot individual

...literal, i32 0, i32 2 %crVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 3 %cbVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 4 %rVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 5 %gVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 6 %bVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 7 %threadID = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 8 %.idx.i = getelementptr %str...

...oundliteral, i32 0, i32 2 %crVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 3 %cbVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 4 %rVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 5 %gVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 6 %bVal = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 7 %threadID = getelementptr inbounds %struct.AKEKernelContext* %.compoundliteral, i32 0, i32 8 %.idx.i = getelementptr %struct...

...for floating point numbers, thus any of my following assumptions maybe wrong. If so, I will be grateful if you clarify me what's goes wrong. But if my guesses are correct we possibly have a bug in fp arithmetics on x86. I have the following ir: @g = constant i64 1 define i32 @main() { %gval = load i64* @g %gvalfp = bitcast i64 %gval to double %fmul = fmul double %gvalfp, -5.000000e-01 %fcmp = fcmp ueq double %fmul, -0.000000e+00 %ret = select i1 %fcmp, i32 1, i32 0 ret i32 %ret } And I expected that minimal positive denormalized double times -0.5 is equal to -0.0, so...