Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "guowei".
2007 Jul 23
1
(no subject)
...ore these errors and excute
the next statement. Otherwise, I have a big big trouble. Do you have some
idea about this problem of ingore errors.
Wish to get your help assp.
thanks.
--
Wei Guo
Department of Statistics
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio 43210
Tel: 001-614-292-4713(o)
e-mail: guowei at stat.osu.edu
2012 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
Hi Xiu,
The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the action
argument,
and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106,
lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp)
Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if
you so wish.
Joey
On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone:
>
> I have a little question about the second argument *action* of
> verifyFunction.
>
> In docs:
>
> *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction*
>
> verifyModule will print to stderr and abort()
> *P...
2012 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
Hello everyone:
I have a little question about the second argument *action* of
verifyFunction.
In docs:
*Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction*
verifyModule will print to stderr and abort()
*PrintMessageAction*
verifyModule will print to stderr and return true
*ReturnStatusAction*
verifyModule will just return true
But it still abort when I pass
2010 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] How to use the return value of a CallInst
Hi all:
I am trying to compare the return value of a call instruction with 0. The
called function's return type is uint32. The return value is 1 or 0. But the
icmp instruction cannot be created.
CallInst *ret = CallInst::Create(ptr_func, params.begin(), params.end(),
"", bb);
Value *cmp = new ICmpInst(*bb, ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, ret,
,ConstantInt::get(getIntegerType(32), 0)
2012 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
...as described as the official document? I
just want to make sure of that and probably we
can find another way to deal with broken module.
Thanks
MK
>
> Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if
> you so wish.
>
> Joey
>
> On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone:
>>
>> I have a little question about the second argument *action* of
>> verifyFunction.
>>
>> In docs:
>>
>> *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction*
>>
>> verifyModu...