search for: guowei

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "guowei".

2007 Jul 23
1
(no subject)
...ore these errors and excute the next statement. Otherwise, I have a big big trouble. Do you have some idea about this problem of ingore errors. Wish to get your help assp. thanks. -- Wei Guo Department of Statistics The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210 Tel: 001-614-292-4713(o) e-mail: guowei at stat.osu.edu
2012 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
Hi Xiu, The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the action argument, and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106, lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp) Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if you so wish. Joey On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone: > > I have a little question about the second argument *action* of > verifyFunction. > > In docs: > > *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction* > > verifyModule will print to stderr and abort() > *P...
2012 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
Hello everyone: I have a little question about the second argument *action* of verifyFunction. In docs: *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction* verifyModule will print to stderr and abort() *PrintMessageAction* verifyModule will print to stderr and return true *ReturnStatusAction* verifyModule will just return true But it still abort when I pass
2010 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] How to use the return value of a CallInst
Hi all: I am trying to compare the return value of a call instruction with 0. The called function's return type is uint32. The return value is 1 or 0. But the icmp instruction cannot be created. CallInst *ret = CallInst::Create(ptr_func, params.begin(), params.end(), "", bb); Value *cmp = new ICmpInst(*bb, ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, ret, ,ConstantInt::get(getIntegerType(32), 0)
2012 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
...as described as the official document? I just want to make sure of that and probably we can find another way to deal with broken module. Thanks MK > > Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if > you so wish. > > Joey > > On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello everyone: >> >> I have a little question about the second argument *action* of >> verifyFunction. >> >> In docs: >> >> *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction* >> >> verifyModu...