search for: gunicorn

...le: /var/run/glusterrest.pid umask: 0 on_reload: <function on_reload at 0x2842c08> pre_exec: <function pre_exec at 0x2847668> worker_tmp_dir: None limit_request_fields: 100 pythonpath: None on_exit: <function on_exit at 0x2847e60> config: /usr/local/etc/glusterrest/gunicorn_config.py logconfig: None check_config: False statsd_prefix: secure_scheme_headers: {'X-FORWARDED-PROTOCOL': 'ssl', 'X-FORWARDED-PROTO': 'https', 'X-FORWARDED-SSL': 'on'} reload_engine: auto proxy_allow_ips: ['127.0.0.1'] pre_req...

...et -q -y -o DPkg::Options::=--force-confold install python-psycopg2'' returned 100: W: Not using locking for read only lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run ''sudo dpkg --configure -a'' to correct the problem. err: /Stage[main]/Python::Gunicorn/File[/var/log/gunicorn]/ensure: change from absent to directory failed: Could not set ''directory on ensure: Read-only file system - /var/log/gunicorn at /tmp/vagrant-puppet/modules-0/python/manifests/gunicorn.pp:11 notice: /Stage[main]/Python::Gunicorn/File[/var/run/gunicorn]/ensure: crea...

...irst test, I edited /opt/syncserver/syncserver.ini. I wanted to keep the default configuration as much as possible, so I provided my server's IP address for 'host' and 'public_url'. --8<----------------------------------------------------------- [server:main] use = egg:gunicorn host = 163.172.220.174 port = 5000 workers = 1 timeout = 30 [app:main] use = egg:syncserver [syncserver] # This must be edited to point to the public URL of your server, # i.e. the URL as seen by Firefox. public_url = http://163.172.220.174:5000/ --8<---------------------...

Hi, I'm currently experimenting with setting up my own Firefox Sync Server on a public server running CentOS 7, following this document: https://mozilla-services.readthedocs.io/en/latest/howtos/run-sync-1.5.html So far I have a partial success. Bookmarks are syncing via the basic internal server running on port 5000, and I can also configure a MySQL database for bookmark storage. What I

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 21:55, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev wrote: > This started since about 1-2 weeks, I guess. I am not sure about it > either, but seems unfortunate. Maybe we run into some kind of timeout? And another one :( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly/builds/1986/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio 2017-08-03 00:24:44 CRITICAL: Results were not

...ng to pull down 100 graphs worth of data kills the server. I ended up limiting those to a max of 10 datasets, and even that takes 30s to load. So I do think we need some improvements to the scalability. LNT usage is spread between two groups. Users who setup big servers, with Postgres and apache/Gunicorn. For those uses I think a NoSQL is the way to go. However, our second (and probably more common) user, is the people running little instance on their own machine to do some local compiler benchmarking. Their setup process needs to be dead simple, and I think requiring a NoSQL database to be setu...

From: Elena Lepilkina Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 2:33 PM To: 'James Molloy' <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>; Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>; Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> Cc: nd <nd at arm.com>; Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization Hi everyone,

...he server. I ended up limiting > those to a max of 10 datasets, and even that takes 30s to load. > > > > So I do think we need some improvements to the scalability. > > > > LNT usage is spread between two groups. Users who setup big servers, with > Postgres and apache/Gunicorn. For those uses I think a NoSQL is the way to > go. However, our second (and probably more common) user, is the people > running little instance on their own machine to do some local compiler > benchmarking. Their setup process needs to be dead simple, and I think > requiring a NoSQL...

...the server. I ended up limiting those to a max of 10 datasets, and even that takes 30s to load. > > > > So I do think we need some improvements to the scalability. > > > > LNT usage is spread between two groups. Users who setup big servers, with Postgres and apache/Gunicorn. For those uses I think a NoSQL is the way to go. However, our second (and probably more common) user, is the people running little instance on their own machine to do some local compiler benchmarking. Their setup process needs to be dead simple, and I think requiring a NoSQL database to be setu...

Daniel, Tobias, Renato and myself have been looking a little bit at the potential underlying reason for why http://llvm.org/perf/ is instable, and have found some clues. I want to share them here to give people with more experience in the frameworks used by LNT (flask, sqlalchemy, wsgi, .) a chance to check if our reasoning below seems plausible. Daniel noticed the following backtrace in the

...ta kills the server. I ended up limiting those to a max of 10 datasets, and even that takes 30s to load. > > > > So I do think we need some improvements to the scalability. > > > > LNT usage is spread between two groups. Users who setup big servers, with Postgres and apache/Gunicorn. For those uses I think a NoSQL is the way to go. However, our second (and probably more common) user, is the people running little instance on their own machine to do some local compiler benchmarking. Their setup process needs to be dead simple, and I think requiring a NoSQL database to be setu...