search for: guid_str

v2: wrap commit message, "PATCH libldm" prefix. v3: correctly initialize and free GLib resources. The result of this patch might be used by libguestfs to return drive mappings for LDM volumes. Note, that "show volume" ldmtool command already returns hint which is a drive letter assigned by Windows to corresponding volume. But it is not reliable source of information. More

v2: wrap commit message, "PATCH libldm" prefix. v3: correctly initialize and free GLib resources. v4: gtk-doc is updated to reflect presence of new volume GUID field. The result of this patch might be used by libguestfs to return drive mappings for LDM volumes. Note, that "show volume" ldmtool command already returns hint which is a drive letter assigned by Windows to

...mod/devicetable-offsets.c b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > index 054405b90ba4..6cbb1062488a 100644 > --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > @@ -231,5 +231,8 @@ int main(void) > DEVID(wmi_device_id); > DEVID_FIELD(wmi_device_id, guid_string); > > + DEVID(mdev_class_id); > + DEVID_FIELD(mdev_class_id, id); > + > return 0; > } > diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c > index c91eba751804..d365dfe7c718 100644 > --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c > +++ b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c...

...mod/devicetable-offsets.c b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > index 054405b90ba4..6cbb1062488a 100644 > --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > @@ -231,5 +231,8 @@ int main(void) > DEVID(wmi_device_id); > DEVID_FIELD(wmi_device_id, guid_string); > > + DEVID(mdev_class_id); > + DEVID_FIELD(mdev_class_id, id); > + > return 0; > } > diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c > index c91eba751804..d365dfe7c718 100644 > --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c > +++ b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c...

...ets.c > >> index 054405b90ba4..6cbb1062488a 100644 > >> --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > >> +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c > >> @@ -231,5 +231,8 @@ int main(void) > >> DEVID(wmi_device_id); > >> DEVID_FIELD(wmi_device_id, guid_string); > >> > >> + DEVID(mdev_class_id); > >> + DEVID_FIELD(mdev_class_id, id); > >> + > >> return 0; > >> } > >> diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c > >> index c91eba751804..d365dfe7c718 1006...

...v_probe, diff --git a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c index 054405b90ba4..6cbb1062488a 100644 --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c @@ -231,5 +231,8 @@ int main(void) DEVID(wmi_device_id); DEVID_FIELD(wmi_device_id, guid_string); + DEVID(mdev_class_id); + DEVID_FIELD(mdev_class_id, id); + return 0; } diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c index c91eba751804..d365dfe7c718 100644 --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c +++ b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c @@ -1335,6 +1335,15 @@ static int do_wmi_entry(con...

...v_probe, diff --git a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c index 054405b90ba4..6cbb1062488a 100644 --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c @@ -231,5 +231,8 @@ int main(void) DEVID(wmi_device_id); DEVID_FIELD(wmi_device_id, guid_string); + DEVID(mdev_class_id); + DEVID_FIELD(mdev_class_id, id); + return 0; } diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c index c91eba751804..45f1c22f49be 100644 --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c +++ b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c @@ -1335,6 +1335,16 @@ static int do_wmi_entry(con...

...b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c >> index 054405b90ba4..6cbb1062488a 100644 >> --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c >> +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c >> @@ -231,5 +231,8 @@ int main(void) >> DEVID(wmi_device_id); >> DEVID_FIELD(wmi_device_id, guid_string); >> >> + DEVID(mdev_class_id); >> + DEVID_FIELD(mdev_class_id, id); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c >> index c91eba751804..d365dfe7c718 100644 >> --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias...

...= 0 mail = 0x0 metadata = {guid = "\242\n\337\066\322|c_\330\004\000\000\303B(\247", virtual_size = 0, physical_size = 0, first_save_date = 0, cache_fields = 0x0, precache_fields = (unknown: 0), backend_ns_prefix = 0x0, backend_ns_type = (unknown: 0)} guid_str = 0x5555557da3f0 "a20adf36d27c635fd8040000c34228a7" #18 cmd_search_run (ctx=0x5555557e9800, user=<optimized out>) at doveadm-mail-search.c:61 _data_stack_cur_id = 2 iter = 0x5555557f3ed0 info = <optimized out> ret = <optimized out> #...

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver to

Hi all: There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver to

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver

Hi all: There are hardwares that can do virtio datapath offloading while having its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio (virtio_mdev) and register itself as a new kind of mdev driver. Then it provides a unified way for kernel virtio driver