search for: guhl

The sample provided config file (the one I started with by editing it) included the following text: # ------------------------------ WARNING ------------------------------- > > # If there's a file /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf, which is part of > # dovecot-postfix package, it will be used instead of dovecot.conf. > > # Keep in mind that, if that file exist, none of the

Hi! I've been pondering about doveadm-search-query(7) and trying to formulate a search query for some time now and it seems there is no way to search for messages, which have been marked DELETED before a certain time. I want to use this to expunge all DELETED messages which have been in that state for 24h or longer. For example a cronjob runs at midnight to expunge those messages but a user

Hi, I have two load-balanced dovecot servers using a single NFS mount. The version is 1.2.11. I chose this so that if one server goes down the other will take up the load, and if my load is too much for one server I just have to add more identical servers. It works, but I wish to move to SAN storage because the NFS server is exhibiting irregular performance. (I spent a lot of time with tcpdump to

...the project". That is all. - Doug Mortensen impalanetworks.com Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Giles Coochey Sent: 5/17/2012 9:33 AM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: This list is being harvested for leads On 17/05/2012 16:20, Dennis Guhl wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:56:50AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2012-05-17 10:20 AM, dovecot-20120517 at billmail.scconsult.com wrote: >>> On 17 May 2012, at 9:46, Charles Marcus wrote: >>>> Tim is working closely with Timo, and I'm sure got Timo'...

Currently if user is 1MB under quota and someone tries to deliver mail that is over 1MB, Dovecot rejects the mail. But smaller mails aren't rejected probably for days. So user might not even realize that they didn't receive one of the mails. Also having a user "almost over quota" is a rather strange state I think. So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last

Hi there, ive got a nasty little problem with my Samba 2.2.1, running on a lfs system with kernel 2.2.18 and glibc 2.2.2 . At boottime i first load smbd with option -D and after that nmbd -D. But immediatly after that nmbd crashes without saying a word. Then i found something very interesting in the logs, here an excerpt of log.nmbd : --------------- snip --------------- [2001/10/10 14:04:07,