search for: guff

...reat that they have them available, most of them seem to have a lot of video of empty room before the speaker starts (sometimes 20 minutes or so). I am wanting to give these to a couple of people and so would like to snip that 20 minutes off and end up with smaller/shorter files which are minus the guff. Is there are simple tool with which I can do this? Secondly; if Vorbis is poor at low quality levels and Xiph develops Speex specifically for speech, why aren't the audio tracks of conference speeches done in speex instead of Vorbis?? Is this because people are more likely to have Vorbis supp...

hello all, I trying to use the package 'odfWeave' and I get the follow error: ### error message ############################################################# ... Removing content.xml Post-processing the contents Error in .Call("RS_XML_Parse", file, handlers, as.logical(addContext), : Error in the XML event driven parser for content_1.xml: error parsing attribute name

...@auditItem[0] = mockAuditItem end The question is, where do I define mockAuditItem. If it inside the describe block, MockAudit cannot see it. If I define mockAuditItem = mock("AuditItem") inside the def for MockAudit then mock isn''t defined. Should I just mixin the Mock class? Guff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-mocks-in-classes-tf4588595.html#a13097948 Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:36:23 +0100 Ralph Corderoy <ralph at inputplus.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > So if i'm using the JIT then it will generate a switch table ? How > > can i test this, since i've been examining the native assembly output > > (is this 'pic' mode?) of llc. > > Presumably the JIT means you end up with a `function

...d a look at this, and it's not yielding any results so far. > Surely objdump expects an elf header, symbol table, etc. ? Try objdump -D -b binary -m i386 /etc/passwd objdump is happy to treat a file of bytes as nothing but machine instructions with no headers, symbols tables, or other guff. Cheers, Ralph.

OK, so I have some *preliminary* results, which are on the whole quite encouraging! I haven't had a great deal of time, but I have managed to get Extempore up and running with function (actually lexical closures so composed of quite a bit of additional guff) level compilation using Andy's multi module suggestion. I also have on-the-fly recompilation of existing closures working (caveats below) so from an end-user perspective this means that Extempore appears functionally equivalent with MCJIT and the old legacy JIT - hot-swapping audio signal proc...

Dear list, The latest "snapshot" is giving me serious guff, but I haven't seen any report of this in moire than a week, so it might be *my* installation. Setup : Debian unstable, often updated. Wine Tools as packaged for Debian by Scott. I have been able to use MS Office 2K apps with various degrees of success with Wine for more than a year. MS Ac...

...base.rb:145:in `deliver'' d:/trevor/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.5.1/lib/action_controller/base.rb:678:in `send'' I''ve cut off the rest of the trace because I''m not sure it''s relevant and I don''t want to clog the list with too much guff. So... anyone seen and solved anything like this? Any pointers on how a complete newb can debug the problem? Thanks for looking, Trevor

Hello All, Finally I realised that the Asterisk demo setup didn't include support for h323. (Maybe it should have been obvious) so I went to work out how to get the h323 channel running. I had openh323 and pwlib installed as I'd been playing with vocal so it didn't take long to do cd asterisk/channels/h323; make; make install; make samples, copy the pwlib and h323 libraries to

...Re: [LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation OK, so I have some *preliminary* results, which are on the whole quite encouraging! I haven't had a great deal of time, but I have managed to get Extempore up and running with function (actually lexical closures so composed of quite a bit of additional guff) level compilation using Andy's multi module suggestion. I also have on-the-fly recompilation of existing closures working (caveats below) so from an end-user perspective this means that Extempore appears functionally equivalent with MCJIT and the old legacy JIT - hot-swapping audio signal proc...

...vs obscurity questions here, in that you can check the Linux source to assure yourself of the security model and implementation. Few people will read the whole thing of course, but to a technically aware person I think perusing the qmail source conveys more confidence than any amount of marketing guff. > 4. What about corporate use of Active X controls > versus Java on a sensitive Intranet? If you absolutely trust everyone in your organization -- which is probably OK up to about fifteen people -- then ActiveX is fine. (Anyhow, rebooting regularly keeps your computer minty fresh.) I...

...* results, which are on the whole quite > encouraging!**** > > ** ** > > I haven't had a great deal of time, but I have managed to get Extempore up > and **** > > running with function (actually lexical closures so composed of quite a > bit of additional**** > > guff) level compilation using Andy's multi module suggestion. I also have > on-the-fly **** > > recompilation of existing closures working (caveats below) so from an > end-user **** > > perspective this means that Extempore appears functionally equivalent with > MCJIT **** >...

...advantages: you can''t easily draw the security boundary where you want it; the setuid program really has to be written in C (with attendant buffer overrun problems et al); and sanitising the environment (not just the environment variables, but things like umasks, ulimits, and all the other guff that children inherit) to make it safe to execute is very difficult. My replacement works as follows: you design your program so that the security boundary is exactly at a program invocation, and replace the setuid call with a call via my `userv'' facility. userv is responsible for proper...

Hi! I've been browsing through the last months' archive and I can't find an answer to my question, so here it is (let's hope it's not too obvious): I'm working on extensions of an R library, and I would be very surprised if everyone developing R packages is doing the following, as I do: 1.- Write down a modification of an R file 2.- Exit the current R

That's awesome! I think at this point having people try out various approaches and seeing what works and what doesn't is our biggest need in this area. Please do keep me informed about what you find out. -Andy From: Andrew Sorensen [mailto:digegoo at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 4:33 PM To: Kaylor, Andrew Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy

...> encouraging!**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I haven't had a great deal of time, but I have managed to get Extempore >> up and **** >> >> running with function (actually lexical closures so composed of quite a >> bit of additional**** >> >> guff) level compilation using Andy's multi module suggestion. I also have >> on-the-fly **** >> >> recompilation of existing closures working (caveats below) so from an >> end-user **** >> >> perspective this means that Extempore appears functionally equivalent &g...

Thanks for the update Andy. I'm very happy to be involved in anyway that is helpful. If you would like me to test ideas, or contribute to further discussions, then please let me know. I currently have extempore running nicely with MCJIT for the "monolithic" case and am working on various LLVM hacks to better understand the issues involved with non-monolithic approaches - in

I know similar topics have been covered before, but I''d like to get a more up-to-date Ruby developer''s opinions. (Please note that I''ve read similar threads in this group and read a lot of hosting comparison sites, even contacted both companies and am still having a hard time making decisions. ) After reading about limitations with shared hosting plans, I decided that

Hello, I just made available a beta version of a port scan detector that I''ve been working on. The program, called Abacus Sentry, is a port scan/probe detector that offers what I think are a number of unique and useful features: - Runs on TCP or UDP sockets. Configurable by the user to bind to multiples of sockets for increased detection coverage. - Adjustable scan detection value with

Hello all, puppet hangs while trying to restart a daemon when the associated config file changes, here the log: Mar 19 11:30:04 ingentTest puppetd[27390]: Starting Puppet client version 0.22.0 puppetd[27390]: Starting configuration run puppetd[27390]: (/ingenttest/qualsevolnode/guaita[guaita]/File[/etc/guaita.conf]/content) synced puppetd[27390]: