Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "guests2".
Did you mean:
guests
2009 Apr 01
1
SIP Context Confusion
...n incoming call (from the code) will be force the context to "guests1" and not have the "user1". I quote:
/* If we have a context defined, overwrite the original context */
For example, in sip.conf:
[general]
context=fromsip
domain=domain1.tld,guests1
domain=domain2.tld,guests2
[userA]
context=user1
It would seem to me, that if the context was NOT set in the SIP entry, and a domain context was available, only then would you replace the context.
To me, I would go from micro to macro definition and not jump around. So we would have peer, domain, general in the SIP con...
2005 Jul 04
1
Annoying lpq commands appear after testparm
...t defined:
printing = cups
print command =
lpq command = %p
lprm command =
But this is after I have defined "printing = cups", any ideas why? Or is
this standard behaviour?
Contents of the master-smb.conf for this BDC follow:
[global]
netbios aliases = GUESTS2
workgroup = GUESTSHIRE
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
log level = 1
syslog = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
smb ports = 139 445
name resolve order = wins bcast...
2005 Jul 07
0
Can't get Local DNS to Run [Was[ remove wins entries - samba 3]]
...amed running; I have
only one.
Eric Hines
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Samba] remove wins entries - samba 3
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:20:55 -0500
From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
References: <80F0EFBEB86B7E4CB2E30B03E00442F39980BB@guests2>
I have the following setup. It's not fancy as I'm just trying to learn
Linux and Samba. My test LAN consists of a Win2k, SP4 box (mustelidae)
and an FC3 (kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC3) server (lserver1) running Samba
3.0.14a. A Samsung printer also is present via a print server plugge...
2018 May 31
1
Re: Two Node Cluster
...nment that
needs to be configured, everything else seems to work fine; KVM can
provision guests, IPSec tunnel is working, vxlan seems to route/function as
I think I would need it, guests can reach the internet, and guests can ping
everything else inside the environment, *except* guests1 cannot ping
guests2.
Which makes me question the configuration I have for each guest network.
Each guest network is currently configured with NAT Forwarding, but because
KVMHost1 cannot ping guests on KVMHost2, I am concluding that a NAT'd guest
network is most likely something that I do not want. I have some cho...
2018 May 30
3
Two Node Cluster
Hello Libvirt Users,
I would like to setup a two node bare-metal cluster. I need to guidance on
the network configuration. I have attached a small diagram, the same
diagram can be seen here: https://i.imgur.com/SOk6a6G.png
I would like to configure the following details:
- Each node has a DHCP enabled guest network where VMs will run. (eg,
*192.168.1.0/24
<http://192.168.1.0/24>* for