search for: guestfs_int_version_from_x_i

Make use of the common version code, and avoid a separate regexp. --- src/osinfo.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/osinfo.c b/src/osinfo.c index 4a4cbfc..f4e2c71 100644 --- a/src/osinfo.c +++ b/src/osinfo.c @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ #include "guestfs.h" #include "guestfs-internal.h" -COMPILE_REGEXP (re_major_minor,

Make use of the common version code, and avoid a separate regexp. --- src/qemu.c | 22 ++-------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/qemu.c b/src/qemu.c index 11bf5cf..844c3f0 100644 --- a/src/qemu.c +++ b/src/qemu.c @@ -37,16 +37,12 @@ #include <libxml/uri.h> -#include <pcre.h> - #include "ignore-value.h" #include

Switch to guestfs_int_version_from_x_y_or_x to parse version numbers -- although, restrict the parsing to what could look like a valid version number, to discard quickly version strings like "unknown". This makes sure that Debian, Fedora, Mageia, and SLED ISOs have the right version number. --- src/osinfo.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Use the version struct in inspect_fs to hold the version of a filesystem, adapting the inspection code to that. Also, move the parts of the version parsing to helper functions of the version struct, so common bits like parsing "X.Y" or "X" version strings is done only once. --- v2 changes: - adapt to v2 changes in patch #1 src/guestfs-internal.h | 8 +-

Hi, this adds an helper version struct, and uses it in the backends (for the libvirt and qemu versions) and inspection code. This also moves common code to that, so it is not repeated in many places. This should help with the small refactoring proposed with https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-May/msg00070.html Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): src: start unifying version handling

Hi, this adds an helper version struct, and uses it in the backends (for the libvirt and qemu versions) and inspection code. This also moves common code to that, so it is not repeated in many places. This should help with the small refactoring proposed with https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-May/msg00070.html Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): src: start unifying version handling

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.