Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "guestfs030config".
2013 Jan 30
0
[PATCH] build: Fix haskell dependencies and parallel build
.../Makefile.am
index 531e404..5328ca0 100644
--- a/haskell/Makefile.am
+++ b/haskell/Makefile.am
@@ -46,25 +46,51 @@ $(all_targets): $(top_builddir)/src/libguestfs.la
all: $(all_targets)
-Guestfs.o: $(srcdir)/Guestfs.hs
- $(GHC) $(GHCFLAGS) -c $< -o $@
+built_tests = Bindtests Guestfs010Load Guestfs030Config Guestfs050LVCreate
-Bindtests: $(srcdir)/Bindtests.hs Guestfs.o
- $(GHC) $(GHCFLAGS) -main-is $(shell basename $@) --make -o $@ $< -lguestfs
+# Building with ghc --make doesn't work properly here because it
+# always rebuilds Guestfs.o despite it being up to date. So if you:
+#
+# * build...
2013 Apr 24
12
[PATCH 00/12] Various patches for fixing separated builds.
This just fixes 'make'.
'make check' is still broken. Further patches for that to follow
tomorrow.
Rich.
2016 Aug 25
2
[PATCH] build: Add common CLEANFILES and DISTCLEANFILES to common-rules.mk.
...-golang.pod
-
man_MANS = guestfs-golang.3
noinst_DATA = $(top_builddir)/website/guestfs-golang.3.html
diff --git a/haskell/Makefile.am b/haskell/Makefile.am
index 64f54bf..b09b06b 100644
--- a/haskell/Makefile.am
+++ b/haskell/Makefile.am
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ built_tests = Bindtests Guestfs010Load Guestfs030Config Guestfs050LVCreate
$(built_tests): %: %.hs Guestfs.hs
$(GHC) $(GHCFLAGS) --make -main-is $@ -odir .$@ -o $@ $< $(srcdir)/Guestfs.hs -lguestfs
-CLEANFILES = $(all_targets) *~ *.hi *.o test-lv-create.img
+CLEANFILES += $(all_targets) *.hi test-lv-create.img
clean-local:
-rm -rf $(built_...
2015 Dec 02
3
[PATCH 0/3] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
This is something I've been working on: Reworking inspection so it's
not a big mess of ad hoc C code, but instead uses a well-defined
domain-specific language to describe how we inspect guests.
The best introduction to this is the manual page, which I include
below (it's also included in patch 2/3).
Rich.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME
2016 Feb 23
4
[PATCH v3 0/4] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
Previously posted:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-December/msg00038.html
Inspection now really succeeds on a small number of simple guests.
To test it out:
$ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /tmp/centos-6.img
><fs> run
><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection --verbose"
Rich.
2015 Dec 05
6
[PATCH 0/6 v2] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
This is a more working version. Inspection (partially) succeeds on a
real guest this time :-)
You can test it out on a real guest (in this case, a CentOS disk image
located at /tmp/centos-6.img) by doing:
$ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /tmp/centos-6.img
><fs> run
><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection --verbose"
which will print lots of debugging, and at the end the
2016 Jan 21
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
For background on this change, see:
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2015/12/06/inspection-now-with-added-prolog/
v2 was previously posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-December/msg00038.html
To test this patch series on a real guest, you can do:
$ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /var/tmp/centos-6.img
><fs> run
><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection
2017 Jan 20
5
[PATCH 0/5] Rename src/ to lib/ and move common code to common/
This patch series moves some files and directories around but is only
code motion (or supposed to be).
A new directory, common/, is created for all of the common code which
is currently shared in random ways between parts of the project.
And src/ becomes lib/ (the largest change, but mostly mechanical).
In full this series makes the following changes:
src/libprotocol -> common/protocol
2017 Jan 25
10
[PATCH v2 0/7] Rename src/ to lib/ and move common code to common/
Previous patch series was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-January/msg00059.html
v2 simply extends this patch series to cover the extra directories
common/edit, common/progress, common/windows and common/parallel.
The only remaining item is to consider whether we should rename mllib
to something else, mlcommon was my suggestion.
Rich.