search for: guestfs030config

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "guestfs030config".

2013 Jan 30
0
[PATCH] build: Fix haskell dependencies and parallel build
.../Makefile.am index 531e404..5328ca0 100644 --- a/haskell/Makefile.am +++ b/haskell/Makefile.am @@ -46,25 +46,51 @@ $(all_targets): $(top_builddir)/src/libguestfs.la all: $(all_targets) -Guestfs.o: $(srcdir)/Guestfs.hs - $(GHC) $(GHCFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ +built_tests = Bindtests Guestfs010Load Guestfs030Config Guestfs050LVCreate -Bindtests: $(srcdir)/Bindtests.hs Guestfs.o - $(GHC) $(GHCFLAGS) -main-is $(shell basename $@) --make -o $@ $< -lguestfs +# Building with ghc --make doesn't work properly here because it +# always rebuilds Guestfs.o despite it being up to date. So if you: +# +# * build...
2013 Apr 24
12
[PATCH 00/12] Various patches for fixing separated builds.
This just fixes 'make'. 'make check' is still broken. Further patches for that to follow tomorrow. Rich.
2016 Aug 25
2
[PATCH] build: Add common CLEANFILES and DISTCLEANFILES to common-rules.mk.
...-golang.pod - man_MANS = guestfs-golang.3 noinst_DATA = $(top_builddir)/website/guestfs-golang.3.html diff --git a/haskell/Makefile.am b/haskell/Makefile.am index 64f54bf..b09b06b 100644 --- a/haskell/Makefile.am +++ b/haskell/Makefile.am @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ built_tests = Bindtests Guestfs010Load Guestfs030Config Guestfs050LVCreate $(built_tests): %: %.hs Guestfs.hs $(GHC) $(GHCFLAGS) --make -main-is $@ -odir .$@ -o $@ $< $(srcdir)/Guestfs.hs -lguestfs -CLEANFILES = $(all_targets) *~ *.hi *.o test-lv-create.img +CLEANFILES += $(all_targets) *.hi test-lv-create.img clean-local: -rm -rf $(built_...
2015 Dec 02
3
[PATCH 0/3] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
This is something I've been working on: Reworking inspection so it's not a big mess of ad hoc C code, but instead uses a well-defined domain-specific language to describe how we inspect guests. The best introduction to this is the manual page, which I include below (it's also included in patch 2/3). Rich. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME
2016 Feb 23
4
[PATCH v3 0/4] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
Previously posted: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-December/msg00038.html Inspection now really succeeds on a small number of simple guests. To test it out: $ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /tmp/centos-6.img ><fs> run ><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection --verbose" Rich.
2015 Dec 05
6
[PATCH 0/6 v2] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
This is a more working version. Inspection (partially) succeeds on a real guest this time :-) You can test it out on a real guest (in this case, a CentOS disk image located at /tmp/centos-6.img) by doing: $ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /tmp/centos-6.img ><fs> run ><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection --verbose" which will print lots of debugging, and at the end the
2016 Jan 21
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] [FOR COMMENTS ONLY] Rework inspection.
For background on this change, see: https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2015/12/06/inspection-now-with-added-prolog/ v2 was previously posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-December/msg00038.html To test this patch series on a real guest, you can do: $ ./run guestfish -v -x -a /var/tmp/centos-6.img ><fs> run ><fs> debug sh "guestfs-inspection
2017 Jan 20
5
[PATCH 0/5] Rename src/ to lib/ and move common code to common/
This patch series moves some files and directories around but is only code motion (or supposed to be). A new directory, common/, is created for all of the common code which is currently shared in random ways between parts of the project. And src/ becomes lib/ (the largest change, but mostly mechanical). In full this series makes the following changes: src/libprotocol -> common/protocol
2017 Jan 25
10
[PATCH v2 0/7] Rename src/ to lib/ and move common code to common/
Previous patch series was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-January/msg00059.html v2 simply extends this patch series to cover the extra directories common/edit, common/progress, common/windows and common/parallel. The only remaining item is to consider whether we should rename mllib to something else, mlcommon was my suggestion. Rich.