search for: gubbin

...hat I want if I can get it to ;) I've spent some time playing with rsync trying to get it to do what I want but I keep getting stumped. The situation is simple, webserver (master) with various files that need backing up (usual config files, a tar of the dbs on the machine, and all the html gubbins). The destination machine, a remote (i.e. off network, backup) machine which I have shell access to which is purely used for backups. I want to set rsync to run from cron daily to backup any changed files to the remote machine so that should anything disasterous happen, e.g. client stupidit...

...nk it requires the "soap/rpc/driver" and "uri" libs, im guessing quite a bit of the functionality for that client comes from that SOAP ruby lib? I guess the bottom line of what im asking is can i use actionwebservice to send my JMF messages without it adding any SOAP/XML-RPC gubbins on top? Otherwise, if i write my own client, would this stop it adding anything to my JMF messages im sending? Many thanks for anyhelp Tim -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to...

Coverity generates false positives when read_atomic() and write_atomic() are called with pointers to objects smaller than 64 bits (because it can''t see that the 64-bit access in the switych statement is dead code). I don''t want to automatically suppress all ofthose, because read_atomic() and write_atomic() could still be called with mis-cast pointers, but for atomic_t accessors

Hello, While working on a fix for the rare-but-possible problem of reentrant NMIs and MCEs, I have discovered that it is sadly possible to generate fake NMIs and MCEs which will run the relevant handlers on the relevant stacks, without invoking any of the other CPU logic for these special interrupts. A fake NMI can be generated by a processor in PIC mode as opposed to Virtual wire mode, with a

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v2 (previous version were posted to few people by mistake; sorry for that). Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code.

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v2 (previous version were posted to few people by mistake; sorry for that). Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code.

Hi, This set of patches contains initial kexec/kdump implementation for Xen v2 (previous version were posted to few people by mistake; sorry for that). Currently only dom0 is supported, however, almost all infrustructure required for domU support is ready. Jan Beulich suggested to merge Xen x86 assembler code with baremetal x86 code. This could simplify and reduce a bit size of kernel code.

Hi guys, I have a problem with powering down my system under the XEN hypervisor. System details are as follows: gentoo linux, X86_64 XEN version 4.2.2 linux hardened kernel 3.9.5 as dom0 Xeon E3 1260L processor (vt-d capable) 32GB ECC RAM which has been thoroughly tested - so should be o.k. when I issue "shutdown -h now" from dom0 the system usually reboots instead of turning off