search for: guarranteed

...onent. Lumping the two versions of "2.0000...." together is the preferable output. I think the best solution will be to preprocess the time variable so that the three operators are consistent. as.numeric(as.character(as.factor(time))) ? Rather ugly. But most importantly what is a guarranteed construct that would ensure consistency? Should we use a rounding level that is more or less equivalent to all.equal()? The solution will have to be incorporated into survfit, coxph, ... perhaps a dozen places in the survival suite so I'd like to get it right the first time. Terry T

That "program" will be detected by your ISP within a day or so, determined to be a virus, and your service will get disconnected...which n turn will not help your latency or jitter at all. VoIP can tolerate a fair amount of latency; latency over about 100ms is heard as a perceptible delay resulting in a connection that appears to be half duplex. Jitter, on the other had, is the real

...group 0 group 1 1.5 0/4 13/13 3 0/4 5/5 8 4/4 0 At time 1.5 group 1 had 13 deaths out of 13 at risk, group 0 had none. Time 8 doesn't have any impact on the fit, since only one group was at risk the deaths are guarranteed to come from that group. So the actual MLE for the hazard ratio is 1/0 = infinity, 100% death rate in group 1 vs. 0% in group 0, at all the time points where the two groups can be compared. Section 3.5 of Therneau and Grambsch, Extending the Cox Model, has a picture of the log-likelihood in such...

After running one too many times into “parent transid verify failed” that prevents a filesystem from being mounted, I found out how to adjust some system blocks so that the kernel could get past that check and mount the filesystem. In one case, I could get all the data I wanted from the filesystem; in another, many checksums failed and I ended up throwing it all away, so no guarrantees.

I noticed that in as.data.frame.table, the stringsAsFactors argument defaults to TRUE, whereas in the other as.data.frame methods, it defaults to default.stringsAsFactors(). The documentation and implementation agree on this, so this is not a bug. However, I was wondering if this disparity was intended or if it might be some sort of unintentional oversight. If it is intentional, I wonder what

Robert, First off, the Samba Technical mailing list is not a help facility. Its purpose is purely for discussion of samba design and code implementation issues. Please confine your email to the normal Samba list. There are several avenues for Samba support: 1. The official documentation that consists of: Samba-3 by Example - a book that provides detailed deployment gudiance The Official

In the real world (or at least in my world) we use undersubscribed internet connections that come with a service level agreement (SLA) that guarantees that the jitter, delay, and packet loss with be within defined parameters in the service agreement. With most DSL and Cable you will not get a SLA, with the cheapest T1s you might get one, but the only penalty to the ISP if they do not meet is a

Is the phrase "index <- match(x, sort(unique(x)))" reliable, in the sense that it will never return NA? Context: Calculation of survival curves involves the concept of unique death times. I've had reported cases in the past where survfit failed, and it was due to the fact that two "differ by machine precision" values would sometimes match and sometimes not,

hpa at zytor.com writes: > On November 19, 2016 6:06:43 AM PST, wferi at niif.hu wrote: > >>"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: >> >>> On 11/10/16 04:38, Paul Emmerich via Syslinux wrote: >>> >>>> Ferenc W?gner <wferi at niif.hu>: >>>> >>>>> for reading configuration files from disk. Does it

Dear List: I have a data frame prepared in the couting process style for including a binary time-dependent covariate. The first few rows look like this. PtNo Start End Status Imp 1 1 0 608.0 0 0 2 2 0 513.0 0 0 3 2 513 887.0 0 1 4 3 0 57.0 0 0 5 3 57 604.0 0 1 6 4 0 150.0 1 0 The outcome

Hello, I''ve been using cbq''s "weight" parameter to influence distribution of excess bandwidth among sibling classes. Does htb offer something similar? So far I think that - you either use priorities - then excess bandwidth is offered to higher priority classes first, the rest (if any) is distributed among lower priority classes - or you don''t use

Hi, A final repost of the below issue -- we still are not making any progress. It is unclear whether we need to be using winbind -- I don't believe so, and the Terpstra Samba 3 book doesn't suggest that this is necessary in this configuration; but please correct me if my preconception is flawed. If this is the 'wrong place' to ask -- any suggestions about where I should be

...break; /* EOF occured */ > > > > if ( *temp ) /* If non-empty line, save to > history */ > > add_history (temp); > > > > strncpy( line, temp, 1023 ); /* Maximum size of > (pstring)line. Null is guarranteed. */ > > #else > 1778a1828 > > #endif > 2123a2174,2177 > > #ifdef HAVE_LIBREADLINE > > /* Allow conditional parsing of the ~/.inputrc file. */ > > rl_readline_name = "smbclient"; > > #endif > > ------------------------------ >...