search for: gtmp

...g sub function^@^PThis is sub ^P^Hb^Q^A^A'>function^@^A^A^@^A^A^G^@^B^C^S^C^Y^A^M^@^G^@^G^C^Y^A^O^@^G^@^G^C^Y^B^O^@^G^@^G������"^@^@^@^@������"^@^@^@^@������^B^Q^@^@^@����^G^F^@^@]^Q^P^@^K<8c>^P^Hb^Q^A^A ^L ^@p^R^B^A^A������p^R^B^A^B������p^R��r^U^A^A^E^G^@^@��^H^@^@^@^A^A^B^Gtmp.1.i^C^G^B^Etmp.0^D^Gtmp.0.i^C^Etmp.2^C^L^L__main.entry^A endif.0.i^@^Eentry��$^M^@^@^B^Y^Nstruct..TorRec^Y^Mstruct.TorRecB^O^A^F.str_2^B^F.str_3^A^R^A^Fprintf^A^U^A^Dexit^A^W^A^Dmain^A^M^A^F.str_1^A^Q^A^OInitialized.0__������ -----------------------------------------------------------------------...

Hi all, I am quite happily running a dovecot setup with maildirs. This was once running courier but since the migration I have never ever looked back. Now, with growing userbase I?m looking into using zlib compression and mdbox instead of maildir. This seems to go quite well using dsync on a testbed server. So let?s go production! Before final decision I came across this: - I?m using a spam

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have trouble using the llvm tools.Some of the errors are : > > $ llvm-dis prog.bc > $ llvm-dis: Invalid Top Level Block Length! Type:1, Size:456 (Vers=0, Pos=12) Can you explain how you generated this bytecode file? It looks corrupted or something. Also, can you send the actual bytecode file itself? Thanks! -Chris >

...zip into the script and go from there. But mdbox seems only accessible via dovecot. I don?t think that accessing via IMAP makes sense for a local script. So I would block myself out when using mdbox. > > How are your spam/ham training routines? How do you feed SA? Let the MTA feed SA. http://gtmp.org/doku.php?id=publications:sa-postfix-en

> Let the MTA feed SA. > http://gtmp.org/doku.php?id=publications:sa-postfix-en Hi Oscar, Hi dovecot-list, I read through the docs, quite interesting read. But I?m wondering, mails are in this case only kept temporary? So re-reading spam and ham is not possible?!? It seems useful still, as it?s direct and not run via a daily cron sc...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking