search for: gtable_dirty_version

...ion read. Yes, my overlook and thanks for pointing out. > >Coding nits: > - I''d like to see the "version" field called something more > descriptive, and moved into the shadow-specific domain state, > since HAP won''t be using it. Done and renamed to gtable_dirty_version. Sorry if this is still not a good name and please feel free help polish a better name. :-) > - In shadow_check_gwalk, maybe return 1 at the top of the function if > the version number hasn''t changed, rather than putting most of the > function inside an if()? Agree. > -...

Just found this patch in house which I thought sent out already. :-) Still one thing remaining is to special case for UP guest which suffers overhead from this change... ---- Remove lock on first guest table walk Existing shadow fault path grabs big lock before walking guest tables, to ensure consistency with shadow content lest concurrent change from other vcpu in a bad OS. But this lock