search for: gt215_ramfuc

...os_M0209S type08; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c index 6abd0e3..fa85942 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct gt215_ramfuc { struct ramfuc_reg r_gpio[4]; }; -struct gt215_ltrain { +struct gt215_ram_train_ddr3 { enum { NVA3_TRAIN_UNKNOWN, NVA3_TRAIN_UNSUPPORTED, @@ -92,11 +92,11 @@ struct gt215_ltrain { struct gt215_ram { struct nvkm_ram base; struct gt215_ramfuc fuc; - struct gt215_ltrain ltrain; + st...

In bulletpoints: - Add some support for G94 and G96 reclocking. Has been tested on literally two cards, which is hardly adequate as "full coverage". On the other hand, the changes were small enough to make me confident this might work for others as well. - Fix NV50 wait for VBLANK when no monitor is plugged in. - Voltage related inprovements for GT21x. - Slightly improve Keplers

No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init

Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern