search for: gssproxi

Hi, folks, Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. Thanks in advance. mark ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [Bug 1699331] gssproxy segmentation fault

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > > See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > > See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can

Hi, I've been working on some systems trying to get kerberized nfsv4 and kerberized web services going on 7. Kerberized nfsv4 was working with 7.0, but with the 7.1 release it stopped working, the key difference between the two setups is that gssproxy wasn't being used with 7.0, but seems to be key with 7.1. The problem I am encountering with Kerberized NFSv4 is that the directory will

I agree that this sounds like, and indeed is, a recipe for disaster. I was going to explain some of the woes of our environment but I don't think it's actually relevant after looking at my problem a bit more. If I'm way off base I'm happy to be herded back, but please tolerate me as I share what I am seeing today because I really hope to solve the narrow issue of SMB file access

Ok, folks, I brought this up some time ago, and got no replies. We have a good number of systems - > 100 - and we use sssd. On the C 7 boxen, which is most of them, gssproxy *frequently* (like once a day or so) dies with a SEGV. It restarts fine. Dies again eventually. ARE other people seeing this? If so, I guess we get to file a bug report with upstream. Speaking as an old C

On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: > Hi, folks, > > Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as > upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of > servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > Mark, See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can get it released into the fasttrack

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1527 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1527.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 6a9a1160f894ed26bbdf4ca9ea1565fd5b28195000bdb3a2dc1945fc76c59e66 gssproxy-0.4.1-8.el7_2.x86_64.rpm Source:

Erik Laxdal wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working on some systems trying to get kerberized nfsv4 and > kerberized web services going on 7. Kerberized nfsv4 was working with > 7.0, but with the 7.1 release it stopped working, the key difference > between the two setups is that gssproxy wasn't being used with 7.0, but > seems to be key with 7.1. > > The problem I am

On 1/25/19 10:27 AM, mark wrote: > Ok, folks, > > I brought this up some time ago, and got no replies. We have a good > number of systems - > 100 - and we use sssd. On the C 7 boxen, which is > most of them, gssproxy *frequently* (like once a day or so) dies with a > SEGV. It restarts fine. Dies again eventually. > > ARE other people seeing this? If so, I guess

On 10/07/2019 17:20, Eric Shell via samba wrote: > I agree that this sounds like, and indeed is, a recipe for disaster. I was > going to explain some of the woes of our environment but I don't think it's > actually relevant after looking at my problem a bit more. If I'm way off > base I'm happy to be herded back, but please tolerate me as I share what I > am seeing

On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > > On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> Hi Louis, >>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? >>> By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work >>> for me because

Hi Rowland, Currently Domain Users doesn't have a gidNumber because it didn't have a corresponding group in OpenLDAP, which is our master directory. The primary Unix group gidNumber for each user is replicated from their OpenLDAP records, but the AD groups have a suffix due to historical name collisions - a POSIX group called harry would be harry-group in AD, but with a matching

On 12/11/2020 14:19, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > > On 11/12/2020 8:52 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>>> Hi Louis, >>>>> I've looked into that

> > When I try to > > access even an already-mounted NFS directory to which I have permission, > > gssproxy complains: > > > > Jul 10 08:55:51 smb gssproxy: gssproxy[1469]: (OID: { 1 2 840 113554 1 2 > 2 > > }) Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information, > > Client 'host/smb.soe.ucsc.edu at AD.SOE.UCSC.EDU' not found in

On 11/12/2020 8:52 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 12/11/2020 13:27, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/12/2020 8:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Louis, >>>> I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? >>>> By the way, even with

On 11/11/2020 10:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > Hi Louis, > I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? > By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work for me because gssproxy), do you do this before accessing root files..? > sudo root > kinit -k 'host$' > OK, after a bit of a battle, I now have a Centos 7 Unix

Hai Jason, Hmm, yes, well, only one thing i can think of now is And thats the last one.. Is the server allowed to delelagate kerberos services? If you have set that also? It's the last thing i can remember. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Jason Keltz via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 november

Hi Louis, Thanks for your message. However, I already have NFS working completely. I'm only trying to work out root NFS access on the client.? I tried your NFS translation fix via idmapd.conf? but that isn't working for me. I've discovered that's because CentOS 7 is using gssproxy so apparently your fix won't work. The fix from Red Hat (adding some lines to krb.conf seen in my

Hi Louis, I've looked into that and I'm not sure how this would be done? By the way, even with your NFS translation fix (which doesn't work for me because gssproxy), do you do this before accessing root files..? sudo root kinit -k 'host$' ? Jason. On Nov. 11, 2020, 2:48 a.m., at 2:48 a.m., "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >Hai