search for: gsoc09

Hi, I am a PhD student interested in participating in GSoC09. Being compilers my area of research, LLVM had got my attention until I read this last post: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-March/021060.html I would like if one of the official LLVM Developers (http://llvm.org/developers.cgi) could confirm this. I understand if you are looking f...

Rodrigo, On Mar 20, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote: > Congratulations to LLVM for getting accepted to GSoC 2009! > > I am a PhD candidate interested in participating this year. I have > been > working on dynamic compilation (binary translation or BT) for > multicore > architectures for a couple of years. I am familiar with the > internals of > several

Filipe Cabecinhas wrote: > Just a thought... How are you going to port llvm so it doesn't use libc? > Valgrind uses the same resources as the running program, so it can't use > the system libc's malloc nor any other functions so it doesn't get > "confused". I think you could to put LLVM into a different process. >> I think I'm the one who put

Hi, Congratulations to LLVM for getting accepted to GSoC 2009! I am a PhD candidate interested in participating this year. I have been working on dynamic compilation (binary translation or BT) for multicore architectures for a couple of years. I am familiar with the internals of several BT frameworks (including open-source Valgrind). I was looking at the ideas page for LLVM. I would like to

Hi, Just a thought... How are you going to port llvm so it doesn't use libc? Valgrind uses the same resources as the running program, so it can't use the system libc's malloc nor any other functions so it doesn't get "confused". Regards and let's hope this project is accepted :-) F Owen Anderson wrote: > Rodrigo, > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 8:41 AM,