search for: grousp

Hi, I'm trying to migrate a samba 3 domain, and I have detected that our domain users and doamin admins are migrated/renamed during migration, we have this grousp in other language than english and ater migration are migrated to domain admin and domain users. Members of this groups are migrated correctly, only question is this change in name could genereate a problem and if this is an issue or I can ignore? Thanks

Hi, Am 11.10.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Trenta sis via samba: > I'm trying to migrate a samba 3 domain, and I have detected that our domain > users and doamin admins are migrated/renamed during migration, we have this > grousp in other language than english and ater migration are migrated to > domain admin and domain users. > Members of this groups are migrated correctly, only question is this change > in name could genereate a problem and if this is an issue or I can ignore? if your well-known groups use the...

...ms, that it should be available in any conditions. But result of this is conflict, when id(1) shows that user is included into group `wheel' (on LDAP), because `id' uses getgroups(2), but su(1) refuses user, because it uses getgrnam(3), which found group "wheel" in /etc/grousp, where user doesn't belong to group "wheel" :( Is here any `standard' solution to this problem? I know about sudo(8), but I affraid, that this inconsistency could bite somewhere else, and in any case, I want su(1) to work :) Is here any reasons why pam_group(8) is inco...

Is it possible to build grousp of channels? I have a series of extensions which are receiving incoming calls to various virtual organizations. Something like this... [foo-incoming] exten => 2122222222, 1, Goto(ACorp|1000|1) exten => 2123333333, 1, Goto(BCorp|1000|1) . . . exten => _NXXNXXXXXX, 1, Goto(GenericCorp|100...

...y "chmod g-w", all group ACLs get "w" removed. To make it easy to revert, the implementation uses a mask, which is set by the open, creat or chmod call. To make a long story short, you look at the "mask" entry in the acl to see what the permission bits for the grousp are. If you don't set enough group bits in create mask and directory mask, the group premissions in the ACLs are reduced. Sounds like something for a FAQ... Do I ever feel dumb! --dave [See also setfcal(1): If you use the chmod(1) command to change the file group owner per...

...t;mmuehlfeld at samba.org>: > Hi, > > Am 11.10.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Trenta sis via samba: > > I'm trying to migrate a samba 3 domain, and I have detected that our > domain > > users and doamin admins are migrated/renamed during migration, we have > this > > grousp in other language than english and ater migration are migrated to > > domain admin and domain users. > > Members of this groups are migrated correctly, only question is this > change > > in name could genereate a problem and if this is an issue or I can > ignore? > > &...