search for: groupd

...723 config_no_plock 0 1234541723 config_plock_rate_limit 100 1234541723 config_plock_ownership 0 1234541723 config_drop_resources_time 10000 1234541723 config_drop_resources_count 10 1234541723 config_drop_resources_age 10000 1234541723 protocol 1.0.0 1234541723 listen 1 1234541723 cpg 5 1234541723 groupd 6 1234541723 uevent 7 1234541723 plocks 10 1234541723 plock cpg message size: 336 bytes 1234541723 setup done 1234541737 client 6: join /setan gfs lock_dlm mars:setan rw /dev/mapper/vg_cluster-lv_cluster 1234541737 mount: /setan gfs lock_dlm mars:setan rw /dev/mapper/vg_cluster-lv_cluster 12345...

This might not be the correct group to post to, but maybe somone could tell me wich groupd it should go to (as I haven't found any good ones). I have Windows XP machines with IEE1394 (FireWire) LAN. Windows has built in support for OHCI compliant cards and can use them as a normal NIC, but with 400Mbit. This sollution is cheap and alot faster than normal a 100Mbit LAN. The problem...

...1000. I then ran the following commands (as root), to make sure all the files were changed to match: find / -uid 500 -exec chown 1000 {} \; -- and -- find / -gid 500 -exec chgrp 1000 {} \; Now, whenever I try to login as that regular user, I get the following error: id: can't find name for groupd ID 500 I have checked /etc/passwd and /etc/group and both files are correctly showing 1000 as the user and group ids. I didn't see the id isn't listed in either of the shadow files. All of the files in the user's home directory have the ownership and group set to id 1000. I have reboo...

First of all, I have GAMs noxd<-gam(newNOX~pressure+maxtemp+s(avetemp,bs="cr")+s(mintemp,bs="cr")+s(RH,bs="cr")+s(solar,bs="cr")+s(windspeed,bs="cr")+s(transport,bs="cr"),family=gaussian (link=log),groupD,methods=REML) Then I type " summary(noxd)". and show Family: gaussian Link function: log Formula: newNO2 ~ pressure + s(maxtemp, bs = "cr") + s(avetemp, bs = "cr") + s(mintemp, bs = "cr") + RH + s(solar, bs = "cr") + s(windspeed, bs...

As a security precaution, we run asterisk as non-root. When zaptel /dev/ devices are created, they get owned:groupd as root:root with rw-r--r-- permissions. As such, chan_zap is unable to work due to bad permissions. Is it safe to simply change permissions on all /dev/zap/* stuff to rw-rw-rw ? Is there a better/safer alternative? Thanks, Matthew

I have 5 GAMs ( model1, model2, model3, model4 and model5) Before I use some data X(predictor -January to June data) to form a equation and calculate the expected value of Y (predictand -January to June). After variable selection, GAMs (Model 1)were bulit up! R-square :0.40 NOW, I want to use new X'( predictor -July - December data) and put into Model 1, then get the expected value of Y'

Hi. Only indirectly related to zfs. I need to test diskusage/performance on zfs shared via nfs. I have installed nevada b64a. Historically uid/gid for user www has been 16/16 but when I try to add uid/gid www via smc with the value 16 I''m not allowed to do so. I''m coming from a FreeBSD backgroup. Here I alter uid using vipw and edit /etc/group afterwards. -- regards Claus

...asn't gotten confused and lost the data on the drive.. If I can how do I fix this. Drbd is currently as follows: [root at mcvpsam01 init.d]# drbd-overview 1:r0 WFConnection Primary/Unknown UpToDate/DUnknown C r---- Cman: [root at mcvpsam01 init.d]# /etc/init.d/cman status groupd is stopped gfs2 mount [root at mcvpsam01 init.d]# ./gfsmount.sh start Mounting gfs2 partition /sbin/mount.gfs2: can't connect to gfs_controld: Connection refused /sbin/mount.gfs2: can't connect to gfs_controld: Connection refused /sbin/mount.gfs2: can't connect to gfs_cont...

I am a newbie to Samba and have read the HOWTO-SMB and README files. Before you say RTFM, I have some very basic questions. The goal for me is to use the NT systems local printer, CD-R and scanner devices. The SMB documents talk a lot about the Client and Server. The source I have downloaded will create a smbd and nmbd. 1. Do I need anything running on the NT? 2. Do I need any special options

<posted & mailed> Dear all, I'm trying to solve the problem, of how to find clusters of values in a vector that are closer than a given value. Illustrated this might look as follows: vector <- c(0,0.45,1,2,3,3.25,3.33,3.75,4.1,5,6,6.45,7,7.1,8) When using '0.5' as the proximity requirement, the following groups would result: 0,0.45 3,3.25,3.33,3.75,4.1 6,6.45 7,7.1

Hi everybody, as discussed and agreed at the Cluster Summit we need to split our tree to make life easier in the long run (etc. etc.). We need to decide how we want to do it and there are different approaches to that. I was able to think of 3. There might be more and I might not have taken everything into consideration so comments and ideas are welcome. At this point we haven't really