search for: group_rid

...the actual primary group for large domains.=0A= - This should really be made into a 'winbind=0A= - force group' smb.conf parameter or=0A= - something like that. */=0A= + 'winbind primary group' smb.conf parameter=0A= + defaults to 0. */=0A= (*info)[i].group_rid =3D DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS;=0A= +=0A= + /* Check for primary group rid */=0A= + if (lp_winbind_primary_group()) {=0A= +=0A= + /* Check for forced primary group */=0A= + if (!lp_winbind_force_primary()) {=0A= + =0A= + /* only set primary group to primary_group if member */=0A= +...

...,7 @@ uint32 logon_time, logoff_time, kickoff_time, + lockout_time, pass_last_set_time, pass_can_change_time, pass_must_change_time; @@ -1304,12 +1321,13 @@ fullname_len, homedir_len, logon_script_len, profile_path_len, acct_desc_len, workstations_len; - uint32 user_rid, group_rid, unknown_3, hours_len, unknown_5, unknown_6; + uint32 user_rid, group_rid, unknown_3, hours_len, unknown_5, unknown_6, bad_pwd_count; uint16 acct_ctrl, logon_divs; uint8 *hours; static uint8 *lm_pw_ptr, *nt_pw_ptr; - uint32 len = 0; + uint32 len = -1; uint32 lm_pw_len, nt_pw_len, hoursle...

Hi! Some time ago (samba 3.0.1?) I added machines to my domain with 'srvmrg.exe' and all went as I expect. IIRC. If I am now adding machines, all machine-accounts have the initially group "users" set instead of "machines". But they should't. | add machine script = useradd -d /dev/null -g machines -s /bin/false %u This is, because even if adding machines to the

..., StephenX A wrote: > Hello Samba, > > We tried to use samba-2.2.4-1 with Rational ClearCase and had a problem > using WinBind. > > ClearCase requires the primary group id to be set to the clearcase users > group. WinBind sets the primary group to something like > DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS. Winbind set's the primary group to whatever is specified by the PDC. Why should we override it? I think I understand what your problem is but I'm not convinvced that this patch should be applied to the main tree. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------...

...port on my Ubuntu jaunty. Here are the versions : samba/jaunty uptodate 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.2 smbldap-tools/jaunty uptodate 0.9.4-1 First of all, smbldap-groupadd don't use the sambaNextRid to create a group, it compute it. Is this a normal way ? I've patch smbldap-groupadd to do this : - #$group_rid = 2*$_groupGidNumber+1001; + $group_rid=get_next_id($config{groupsdn},"sambaNextRID"); But that doesn't work :(( Here is the long story I can add a group using the command : sudo /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -a titii Everything is fine : sambaSID in group is Ok (RID=1022) and sambaNex...

...the domain. Read about that here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-October/094310.html Igor Belyi said: >| Interesting case... The request comes from Windows to update machine >| account with a bunch of new values and in this request RID of the >| primary group for the account (group_rid) is listed as 513 (0x201). >| >| If you look at the 'fields_present' in the request you will notice that >| it requests almost all information to be updated - 09f827fa (this is a >| bitwise mask of fields to be updated). When I add a computer in my >| domain I have it onl...

Hi, is there a HOWTO about migrating from Samba TNG to Samba 2.2? I have problems with the user profiles on the Windows client machines, they are recreated on login on the new Samba (2.2.5) machine. I copied the SID (with smbpasswd), /etc/passwd and smbpasswd to the new machine, and everything works fine, except for the user profiles. Currently we are not using server-saved profile, but we will

...1 Dec 1969 19:00:00 EST Password last set Time : Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:59:08 EDT Password can change Time : Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:59:08 EDT Password must change Time: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:11 EDT unknown_2[0..31]... user_rid : 0x457 group_rid: 0x201 acb_info : 0x00000010 fields_present: 0x08ffffff logon_divs: 168 bad_password_count: 0x00000001 logon_count: 0x00000000 padding1[0..7]... logon_hrs[0..21]... Not sure I see where the expiration is except that Kicko...

...1 Dec 1969 19:00:00 EST Password last set Time : Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:25:39 EDT Password can change Time : Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:25:39 EDT Password must change Time: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 10:26:42 EDT unknown_2[0..31]... user_rid : 0x457 group_rid: 0x201 acb_info : 0x00000010 fields_present: 0x08ffffff logon_divs: 168 bad_password_count: 0x00000000 logon_count: 0x00000000 padding1[0..7]... logon_hrs[0..21]... --Mark

I'm a little less new to samba now - but having a heck of a time getting authentication to work. I'm running NIS+, configured samba with --with-nisplus --with-nisplus-home and --with-automount. Does anyone have some good nis/samba references? I'm striking out. The smbpasswd file *does* have to become smbpasswd.org_dir for samba to work. I first created the smbpasswd file using

> 3. The only evidence of any problem from the vampire command is the > events logged on the PDC, and the invalid passwords. I tried > deleting the trust account on the PDC and rejoining several times, > with Samba on, off, and nmbd on and off. The result is always the > same. The bad password hashes are always the same for each account. > If I change a password on the PDC

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 20:19:02 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 20:14:00 +1300 Andrew Bartlett > > <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 03:09 -0400, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > Actually, that didn't quite work. It did change the

I'm trying to grasp pg. 154 of the "Official SAMBA-3" book by Terpstra and Vernooij and I'm just missing a critical networking concept. I understand that SIDs are the numerical identification of a user for the Windows world. I understand that UIDs are the equivalent for the *nix world. But what the @$@! is a Relative IDentifier (RID)?!? On page 153 the command to map a

On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 11:42:07 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 12:25:14 +0100 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > wrote: > > > > This will then prompt the user for their 'oldpassword' and then the > > new password (twice). There is a gotcha though, as given it will > > only work on a DC, to do the

...n_count : 0988 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(613) ~ 0066 bad_pw_count : 0000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 0068 user_rid : 00000471 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 006c group_rid : 00000201 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 0070 num_groups : 00000005 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 0074 buffer_groups : 0002000c [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00...

...ogon_count : 0703 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(681) 0066 bad_pw_count : 0000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0068 user_rid : 0000049f [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 006c group_rid : 00000201 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0070 num_groups : 00000005 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0074 buffer_groups : 0014416c [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0078...

...4 logon_count : 0703 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(681) 0066 bad_pw_count : 0000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0068 user_rid : 0000049f [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 006c group_rid : 00000201 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0070 num_groups : 00000005 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0074 buffer_groups : 0014416c [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 0078 use...

...ogon_count : 0000 [2003/09/08 10:03:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(605) 007a bad_pw_count : 0000 [2003/09/08 10:03:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(634) 007c user_rid : 00000bbc [2003/09/08 10:03:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(634) 0080 group_rid : 000004b1 [2003/09/08 10:03:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(634) 0084 num_groups : 00000001 [2003/09/08 10:03:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(634) 0088 buffer_groups : 00000001 [2003/09/08 10:03:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(634) 008c...

...ogon_count : 0000 [2004/01/09 16:47:53, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(606) 007a bad_pw_count : 0000 [2004/01/09 16:47:53, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 007c user_rid : 00000c80 [2004/01/09 16:47:53, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 0080 group_rid : 00000201 [2004/01/09 16:47:53, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 0084 num_groups : 00000003 [2004/01/09 16:47:53, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 0088 buffer_groups : 00000001 [2004/01/09 16:47:53, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) 008c...

.../06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(606) > 007a bad_pw_count : 0000 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 007c user_rid : 00000bba > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 0080 group_rid : 00000201 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 0084 num_groups : 00000001 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635) > 0088 buffer_groups : 00000001 > [2004/06/21 15:27:18, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_ui...