search for: group_2

...rary - excellent work. Thank you. Now, here''s what I''m doing: <div id="wrapper"> <fieldset id="page_1"> <legend>Page</legend> <fieldset id="group_1"> Group </fieldset> <fieldset id="group_2"> Group </fieldset> </fieldset> <fieldset id="page_2"> <legend>Page</legend> <fieldset> Group </fieldset> </fieldset> </div> Both the ''pages'' and ''groups''...

...that cause the trouble. (Attention: 10 Downloads only, so you may have to send me an e-mail so I can mail you the Rdata file directly.) > library(exactRankTests) Package ?exactRankTests? is no longer under development. Please consider using package ?coin? instead. > wilcox.exact(group_1,group_2,exact=T) Error in .Call("cpermdist2", ma = as.integer(m), mb = as.integer(col), : negative length vectors are not allowed > wilcox.exact(group_3,group_4,exact=T) Error in .Call("cpermdist2", ma = as.integer(m), mb = as.integer(col), : cannot allocate vector of length...

...l_audit:priority = NOTICE # Example share [SHARE_NAME] access based share enum = yes browseable = yes comment = <COMMENT> create mask = 0660 directory mask = 2770 force group = <FORCE_GROUP_NAME> path = <PATH> guest ok = no public = no writeable = yes valid users = +GROUP_1 +GROUP_2 vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite full_audit:failure = none full_audit:facility = local7 full_audit:priority = NOTICE Thanks, Sergei > On Jan 7, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.s...

...er team, I'm facing an strange issue, and I had no idea where to put the information so I came here I've a simple configuration, like this : table ip filter { map ok { type mark : verdict elements = { 0x00000001 : jump group_1, 0x00000002 : jump group_2} } chain group_1 { limit rate 100 kbytes/second counter accept counter drop } chain group_2 { limit rate 200 kbytes/second counter accept counter drop } chain group_3 {...

> Lets hold off with logs, do you know that if you remove everything > that should be in a share from the [global] part of your smb.conf, you > get left with just '[global]’. The share actually comes from an include file. I made it look like it’s part of the main config for simplicity. > It also doesn't help that everything > that is in [global] is also in the share. It’s

...NAME] > access based share enum = yes > browseable = yes > comment = <COMMENT> > create mask = 0660 > directory mask = 2770 > force group = <FORCE_GROUP_NAME> > path = <PATH> > guest ok = no > public = no > writeable = yes > valid users = +GROUP_1 +GROUP_2 > vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb > full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S > full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite > full_audit:failure = none > full_audit:facility = local7 > full_audit:priority = NOTICE > > Thanks, > Sergei > > > On Jan 7, 2017, a...

...NAME] > access based share enum = yes > browseable = yes > comment = <COMMENT> > create mask = 0660 > directory mask = 2770 > force group = <FORCE_GROUP_NAME> > path = <PATH> > guest ok = no > public = no > writeable = yes > valid users = +GROUP_1 +GROUP_2 > vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb > full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S > full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite > full_audit:failure = none > full_audit:facility = local7 > full_audit:priority = NOTICE > > There are too many shares to include them all, but they...

...browseable = yes > > comment = <COMMENT> > > create mask = 0660 > > directory mask = 2770 > > force group = <FORCE_GROUP_NAME> > > path = <PATH> > > guest ok = no > > public = no > > writeable = yes > > valid users = +GROUP_1 +GROUP_2 > > vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb > > full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S > > full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite > > full_audit:failure = none > > full_audit:facility = local7 > > full_audit:priority = NOTICE > > > > There are too ma...

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

...t; > Now, here''s what I''m doing: > > <div id="wrapper"> > <fieldset id="page_1"> > <legend>Page</legend> > <fieldset id="group_1"> > Group > </fieldset> > <fieldset id="group_2"> > Group > </fieldset> > </fieldset> > > <fieldset id="page_2"> > <legend>Page</legend> > <fieldset> > Group > </fieldset> > </fieldset> > </div> > > Both the ''...