search for: groks_dash_o

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "groks_dash_o".

2004 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] Optimization Levels - Need The Details
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to > get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O > family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting > your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you > can provide it by early this coming
2004 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] Optimization Levels - Need The Details
...t to list the equivalent set of pass names as options. This way the tool (typically a translator or optimization) can just use whatever is right without messing with the config file. So, instead of "lang.opt1" and friends the tool would use something like: translator.groks_dash_O=false optimizer.groks_dash_O=true which says we can't pass -On to the "translator" but we can pass it to the optimizer. 3. Default -O1 to be -simplifycfg, -instcombine, and -mem2reg just for utility and ease of use. Does this sound reasonable for a first cut? The con...
2004 Aug 15
4
[LLVMdev] Optimization Levels - Need The Details
Folks, I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you can provide it by early this coming week. For clarity, the -O options are currently defined