Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "groks_dash_o".
2004 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] Optimization Levels - Need The Details
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to
> get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O
> family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting
> your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you
> can provide it by early this coming
2004 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] Optimization Levels - Need The Details
...t to list the equivalent
set of pass names as options. This way the tool (typically a
translator or optimization) can just use whatever is right without
messing with the config file. So, instead of "lang.opt1" and
friends
the tool would use something like:
translator.groks_dash_O=false
optimizer.groks_dash_O=true
which says we can't pass -On to the "translator" but we can pass it
to the optimizer.
3. Default -O1 to be -simplifycfg, -instcombine, and -mem2reg just for
utility and ease of use.
Does this sound reasonable for a first cut? The con...
2004 Aug 15
4
[LLVMdev] Optimization Levels - Need The Details
Folks,
I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to
get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O
family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting
your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you
can provide it by early this coming week.
For clarity, the -O options are currently defined